Gumbo4x4
Note to the ladies who forgot to
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2012
- Messages
- 25,659
Not only do I not, since I asked the question, but someone else on this thread seems to agree with that interpretation.
Disneyjunky, in attempting to understand you, asked if you thought that profiting off of atrocities is fine. You quoted her and said everyone does, even Native Americans living on reservations. So, by specifying those who live on reservations, you are indicating that those locations are benefits of atrocities. I'm not the only person who read your post that way.
I gave the example of ALL, and went on to add the Native Americans as an aside.
It’s really pretty simple. Some atrocity or series of them has lead to where we are today. Your very existence, not to mention your ability to earn a living and speak on a discussion board are owed, at least in part, to past atrocities.
The native Americans alive today (on or off reservations) only exist because their ancestors were the conquerors of their time. That means they benefit today from those ancient atrocities. And yes, those on the reservations (and some not) are obviously victims of more recent atrocities. It is possible to be both victim & beneficiary.
Disneyjunky is taking issue with the notion that today’s generation of South African whites is benefiting from the atrocious acts of prior generations. Fair point. But, my point is that’s how it works everywhere. Some places are just further removed from that generation than others. And that doesn’t justify new atrocities against the current beneficiaries.