People use them on the best trained dogs to keep them safe - is the safety of a child "less" important?
I'm 60 - my mom had to use a harness on me when I was a toddler (I was a speedy "wanderer" - LOL) - and I survived just fine.. No feelings of "degradation" at all..
Yep, that's what I was trying to say!
I'm 40 and my mom used them with us. We have the BEST pictures of me and my brother with our black chest harnesses, and then our two big sled dogs with their collars and leashes, and it was just my mom. Just her. She loved us, she loved the dogs. She kept ALL of us safe.
People sometimes want to use the "treat like a dog" thing as a negative, but for the most part, people treat their dogs wonderfully! I see NOTHING bad about being "treated like a dog", when it means we're safer for it.
...and letting little Junior have the full length of leash in crowded settings, regardless of the obstacle/tripping hazard that it creates for other people trying to walk in the area. It might make the kid happier to have a little freedom, but that freedom is creating a trip line between the kiddo and the parent.
OK OK so here's the problem. You see that, right? The parent probably sees it too.
So here's the parent's choice. Let that happen.
Or pull the kid back, using the connection between them. So NOW you'll see "gasp, they are using it to pull the poor child, poor little thing." Or if you don't see that part, someone ELSE will see it, and report the awful behaviour you saw on the part of the parent, PULLING the kid back.
People don't use harnesses on kids who listen perfectly. They use them on kids who aren't the perfect angels. On kids who can wriggle out of what you thought was a tight grasp on their hand/wrist/arm. (my friend's kid was a master at that!) On runners. They aren't being used on kids who "come when you call them". So you're going to end up in that situation with a kid who is needs a harness to begin with.
I'll be honest here. I tried to use them with DS. I'm a chiropractor and HATE seeing little kids with their arms up in the air holding hands, and when a parent has to bend down to reach the kid's hand. It isn't good for spines or other bones of the body. And DS was NOT perfect about coming back when he was called.
So I tried. Unfortunately, he really really really enjoyed acting like a sled dog breaking a sled free from the ice, which dogs accomplish by slamming their bodies hard at the ends of their leads, to shock the sled free. Now pictures my SHOULDER as the stuck sled, and we've got a bad situation.
The very last time I used the harness was at the airport, waiting for a friend. He was playing with how much room he had (it was late night, no crowds), and decided to go to the end of the lead and leaaaaaaannnnnnnn.
Can you even IMAGINE how bad that looked? How I had no good options at that point? I either had to keep holding on, hoping that he was smiling big to show people it was a fun game, or I had to haul him back, which would then look even worse. There were no good options. I was sweating with the effort of holding him and not dropping him on his face (another horrid option), talking to him to get him to stand up, etc etc.
It was at that point that I realized it wasn't working for us.
But I use that experience to illustrate that if you're seeing a moment in time, you have NO idea what caused that moment.
Are all bad looking moments like that? Nope. There are some people who use them rudely. Take away the lead and you've got a kid having their shoulder or elbow yanked out of alignment. You've got someone being led around with body parts just as rudely. A rude parent is a rude parent, no matter if they use hands or monkey backpacks.