Here is an interesting question related to a tragic situation:
A few months ago both of my parents were killed in a multi vehicle accident on a county road. My father was driving and my mother was on the passenger seat. Both were killed instantly when a semi truck hit the car going 60 MPH.
Now after a significant investigation, it was determined that my father was 100% at fault in the accident for driving through a stop sign right into the path of the semi truck. A personal injury attorney has contacted us and has told us we have a case for the wrongful death of my mother. He would take the case for one third of the settlement. If he loses and there is no settlement, we would pay nothing. Basically we would indirectly sue my father (who is deceased) for being at fault in the accident. His insurance company would then pay the settlement based on the fact that my mother, who died in the accident, was an innocent THIRD PARTY. She has no control over my fathers bad driving that day as a passenger of the car.
The attorney's argument in the case is this is a legal and moral lawsuit because if someone other than my mother (maybe a friend or next door neighbor) was in the car in the passenger seat and was killed in the accident, their personal representative/family would sue my father's estate and the insurance company for wrongful death, why should it be any different for my mother? Either passenger would be an innocent third party.
What do you think?
A few months ago both of my parents were killed in a multi vehicle accident on a county road. My father was driving and my mother was on the passenger seat. Both were killed instantly when a semi truck hit the car going 60 MPH.
Now after a significant investigation, it was determined that my father was 100% at fault in the accident for driving through a stop sign right into the path of the semi truck. A personal injury attorney has contacted us and has told us we have a case for the wrongful death of my mother. He would take the case for one third of the settlement. If he loses and there is no settlement, we would pay nothing. Basically we would indirectly sue my father (who is deceased) for being at fault in the accident. His insurance company would then pay the settlement based on the fact that my mother, who died in the accident, was an innocent THIRD PARTY. She has no control over my fathers bad driving that day as a passenger of the car.
The attorney's argument in the case is this is a legal and moral lawsuit because if someone other than my mother (maybe a friend or next door neighbor) was in the car in the passenger seat and was killed in the accident, their personal representative/family would sue my father's estate and the insurance company for wrongful death, why should it be any different for my mother? Either passenger would be an innocent third party.
What do you think?