lillygator
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2003
- Messages
- 32,741
cheating and leaving your current spouse?
true he should have divorced his wife first and then had a relationship with TY. Should a person be able to avoid jail by paying off his victims?
I'm lost
What/Who is this thread about?
In believing this, especially the part I've highlighted, I implicitly reject the idea that any two people are "meant to be together", or at least reject it as a possibility after one has made a commitment to someone else. Since commitment is the bedrock of being "meant to be together", anything that defiles commitment, itself, precludes being "meant to be together". Put more simply, if two people were literally "meant to be together", neither would never have found themselves having had made a commitment to someone else, previously.Though it isn't the [sole] foundation of our marriage, I think that all that is necessary for a long, successful marriage is commitment. I believe humans are powerful enough to acknowledge the value of loving their spouse; acknowledge the value of fulfilling their spouse's emotional, spiritual and physical needs; acknowledge the value of fostering their spouse's life-long growth, development and accomplishment; acknowledge the value of being attracted to their spouse and working diligently to be attractive to their spouse (as opposed to relying solely on animal instincts). (And so on...)
And as long as both spouses are committed, and recognize and exercise those powers, I believe a long, successful marriage can be build from practically nothing (if necessary). It does require, though, trusting that the commitment is mutual. It does require, though, acknowledging that these values are greater than transitory distractions from that commitment. (And so on...)
"Meant to be together" is an excuse, a justification, a rationalization that a person uses to give himself permission to do something he knows to be wrong. It implies that this feeling is stronger than he is, that he cannot control himself in the face of destiny, and that this desire for the new person is worth hurting his current spouse and children. It's usually meant to excuse the guilty parties from their choices because, after all, they didn't choose to do this, it was just "meant to be".cheating and leaving your current spouse?
I mentioned this in another thread recently:In believing this, especially the part I've highlighted, I implicitly reject the idea that any two people are "meant to be together", or at least reject it as a possibility after one has made a commitment to someone else. Since commitment is the bedrock of being "meant to be together", anything that defiles commitment, itself, precludes being "meant to be together". Put more simply, if two people were literally "meant to be together", neither would ever have found themselves having had made a commitment to someone else, previously.
I refer to my wife as "The Love of My Life". I actually relabel her as such in my contact list in some instant messaging systems we use to communicate with each other when we're not together. I think some folks might see that as some allusion to destiny or fate. It isn't. It is strictly a reflection of my decision, my commitment. She is the "The Love of My Life" because we, together, have made it so.
"Meant to be together" is an excuse, a justification, a rationalization that a person uses to give himself permission to do something he knows to be wrong. It implies that this feeling is stronger than he is, that he cannot control himself in the face of destiny, and that this desire for the new person is worth hurting his current spouse and children. It's usually meant to excuse the guilty parties from their choices because, after all, they didn't choose to do this, it was just "meant to be".
If you're meant to be together with someone not your spouse then leave your spouse correctly and then be with that person. Love does not justify cheating...or as I see it, breach of contract.
I think that would be a nice tihngPerhaps in the future, people could explain what the thread is about in the first post or two. That would be awesome.