The posting about a timeline is also credited to someone speaking to someone at DVC -- and that has already proven to be in error. Hopefully, it will be $.03-$.04 but it is just one person's conversation with one CM, not an announcement at the annual meeting. I'm not singling out Daisy because my gut says what she posted is true to her knowledge but, really, how do we know what is and isn't true that is posted by anyone, especially about one-on-one conversations? What's to stop someone from recounting an "official" conversation that never happened to bolster their point?
Long story short, it wasn't an announcement at the meeting itself as was previously posted. The guesstimate is $.03-$.04.
Long story short, it wasn't an announcement at the meeting itself as was previously posted. The guesstimate is $.03-$.04.