SueM in MN said:The information that someone posted (post # 23 on page 2) from the U.S. District Court in Atlanta, saying that there was proof of an intruder, is from a libel case against the Ramseys (interestingly, they complained about people suspecting them, but their book is full of accusations against other people, some of whom were totally ruled out by the police). The information was not from the evidence in the case, but from the Ramsey family lawyer's interpretation of the evidence.
Actually, the information in that article was taken from the ruling of the judge in that civil case. It's an interesting read, if you ever have the chance.