ead79
<font color=#FF0066>Disney Bride!<br><font color=v
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2000
- Messages
- 10,436
You're not assuming Karr is guilty, but you certainly are assuming that the Ramseys are based on your comments in this thread. I think your news updates and insights are very interesting, but they are one-sided.beachblanket said:Good advice, and that's precisely what I'm doing. I've neither claimed Karr is innocent or guilty. Pointing out (as Luv2Roam excellently did) that there are major potential holes in a case against him (which I have also done) is a lot different than walking is here and stating that his mere arrest "vindicates" someone else.
I'm not saying there aren't some questions that absolutely have to be answered before Karr could ever be found guilty, but it seems that you are evaluating the evidence from the point of view that he is unquestionably innocent. For instance, I heard the information you mentioned on the radio this morning about the family photo from Christmas of 1996. It's hardly a fool-proof alibi given that Karr is NOT in the picture. I'm not saying that it means he wasn't there, just that is likewise doesn't mean he was there. Also, I disagree with the premise that his ex-wife doesn't like him and thus has no reason to lie for him. I don't think that anyone would want to accept their ex-husband was a murderer and pedophile. To me that gives her a possible reason to defend him. I'm not saying that she is lying for sure, just that I can see how she possibly could be to save face.
I am very interested in hearing the information that the authorities are still holding back while the investigation is ongoing. The DNA results are certainly something I want to hear about, as is the other info they are still holding. I heard a portion of the audio tape where Karr spoke about the JonBenet killing to that woman (whose name escapes me right now), but the news specifically said that they were only given a portion of the tape. I wonder what else it says that we haven't heard.
Karr is certainly a sick, sick man, but I'm not sure he's guilty. I don't know if the reason his story doesn't add up is because he has invented an alternate reality in his mind (with comments like being there when she died but not accepting responsibility) or because he is truly innocent. As more info becomes available, it should become more clear.