I'm not sure if you're speaking to me or to Whitney, but I wasn't arguing. I want to see your links. I tried googling, but have no idea what it is I'm looking for.
And I'm serious, if they're not classified as actors ... then what does it matter what child labor laws there are, anywhere? they don't apply to the Gosselins, because those kids aren't actors. I don't understand, from either side, what the argument is. It seems like a moot point to me. I'm just trying to understand. that's all.
You are correct. IF they became classified as employed performers within the state of NC, there would be no protection offered by law. It would make no difference what they are "called."
In the case of other states (maybe PA?), the classification of "actor" could offer guidelines/protection/laws, whatever. That's why Paul Peterson's group wants kids like them to be considered employed actors. When labor laws apply from both the federal and state level, it is not automatically the federal law that prevails. It is the one that offers the most protection.
I have no opinion on this subject, which came up a few pages back,only offering a little knowledge as a North Carolinian.
