Luv'sTink
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2006
- Messages
- 5,382
Wendy Murphy, JD
specializing in the representation of crime victims, women and children.
http://wendymurphylaw.com/jodi-hannibal-lecter-arias/
specializing in the representation of crime victims, women and children.
http://wendymurphylaw.com/jodi-hannibal-lecter-arias/
The most striking observation the author makes is that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, which will ultimately decide the constitutionality of the verdict in Arias case if she is sentenced to death, has overturned the death penalty in no less than thirteen cases in the past decade alone based on defense counsel intentionally committing ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to put on mitigation evidence during the sentencing hearing.
If that was the plan in Arias case, then all the pundits were wrong when they said it was strange that the defense attorneys didnt call Jodi Arias family members and friends to testify about mitigation evidence. It wasnt strange, it was strategic, some would say unethical, but it had nothing to do with the witnesses being threatened or afraid to testify for fear of what might be brought up during cross-examination.
Arias lawyers hedged their bets, knowing that even if Jodis entire family and all her childhood friends took the stand and begged for her life, the jury would still vote for death simply because no amount of mitigation evidence would make a dent in the mountain of reasons that justify imposition of the ultimate punishment.
By refusing to put Arias friends and family on the stand, defense attorneys knew they might lose the battle but would likely win the war if the jury voted for death. The Ninth Circuits predisposition to reverse death penalty verdicts when mitigation witnesses are not called was a near guarantee that Arias would never be put to death. This remains a viable strategic option given that a new jury will be impaneled to decide the death penalty issue in July, which means we can expect Arias family members again to sit silent instead of begging for Jodis life. Perhaps the prosecutor should consider calling Jodis mother to the stand, if only to expose the strategy and create a record that would at least make it more difficult for the Ninth Circuit to indulge the nonsense.