I have the right to be angry at them for not finishing their job and as I stated before I don't care if you or anybody else agrees with me. I can state how I feel about this just like anyone else can, I am not gonna apologize for being passionate about this trial.
Oh and religion and personal beliefs ARE NOT a reason for why this jury can say no to a death verdict and it be ok, because they were ALL asked before the trial started "Could you give the Death Penalty?", so if you could not because of religious rules they mark they should of marked no on their questionnaire.
I personally hope that religion and/or personal beliefs were not the reason that any of the 4 people that said no did so, because if it was then they lied on their questionnaire and their lie did nothing, but cause pain for TA's family in the end!
I never said they should be physically harmed or anything like that as you and others seem to be implying, I would never say that and I have not.
However, if they lied on their questionnaire and KNEW the whole time that they COULD NOT render the DP on a case this massive & important, that has gone on this long and cost this much money to BOTH the state and Travis's own family then some blame falls on them. Those people could have and should have asked off the case, knowing that when it came to this stage they could not properly, or fairly do their job.
Oh and don't to tell me what to do, do I tell what you should think or feel and/or how you should act? No, so don't tell or suggest what I should do in regards to this case or anything else for that matter. I don't appreciate that one bit.
I suspect that the mitigation penalty phase is extremely subjective to each person. What you would consider proper mitigation for allowing Jodi Arias to live would not be the same as another person. I don't think 4 jurors decided they couldn't sentence JA to death. Rather, they each found some mitigation factor that the others did not agree were enough of a mitigation factor to allow JA a life sentence. I think that each side tried their best to come to agreement but couldn't.
As non-jurors, it's much easier to make a up or down vote based on the feelings of your knowledge of the case. But these jurors had to go through each mitigation factor presented to them by the defense and either say it was a worthy mitigation factor or not. 4 found some mitigation. 8 did not.