I don't think this has been posted. I just copied this from Chris Huges FB page
OK, so I have been pretty quiet through this trial
so far. We have decided to not do any media until after the trial is over. We had no idea how hard that commitment would be to keep as we had underestimated the attack that would be made on Travis. But we made it, so we will keep it. That said, there are a few things I need to clear up that are floating around on the net
..
IT (Jodi), being IT, c...ame up with a whole new set of lies in 2010. Lies, I would imagine, she is going to try to work into this trial, as she fights for her life. I didn't think she would attempt to do this as there is no evidence as to the validity of these claims. There are only letters conjured by IT that were thrown out of court and deemed "fraudulent." I just figured she, and everyone on her team, had given up on these ridiculous claims until I read the posts below:
"It also makes you wonder just how much Chris & Sky Hughes really knew about TAs child addiction (and the physical/verbal abuse he inflicted upon Jodi in private). Remember Skys initial reaction to one of TAs letters too, where she specifically referenced TAs age of attraction?" and "(& subsequent cover-up of TAs abuse & child porn-related issues) by Chris & Sky Hughes."
UNBELIEVABLE! Are people really this delusional? This info is from fake letters
too fake even for the National Enquirer to run with! That is saying something! Some of you heard me call Nurmi a liar. It was related to these claims. He had LIED to my wife. He emailed her a letter, telling her it was "100% verified to be Travis' writing" and that there was "irrefutable evidence" backing up these claims. #1- It's near impossible to verify something 100%. AND it is absolutely impossible to even come close if there is no original (which we later found there is not). #2- There is no, and never has been "irrefutable evidence" to back up these claims. He totally lied! Sky's reaction to what Nurmi sent her had ZERO to do with Travis and his character, and EVERYTHING to do with Nurmi's lies and manipulative tactics and her experiences working with sexually abused kids. The ONLY reason Sky even went there, as far as Travis was concerned, was because Nurmi told her there was "irrefutable evidence," and to us, the only thing irrefutable would be video tapes. We had NO IDEA that it was legal for the defense attorney to lie about evidence to try to sway someone's testimony (we had been subpoenaed to testify in a hearing the following week). Unbelievably unethical in my opinion.
I just wanted everyone to be aware of this, because I'm guessing Jodi, being the shamelessly evil person she is, is going to make these asinine claims! Here is what we know about Jodi
and it is truly "irrefutable." Jodi lies
and lies
and lies
it's just what she does, and who she is. She has done it from the beginning, and we can expect more of it until this trial is over. To expect anything other than lies from Jodi would be naive at best. Travis is not, and never has been, a pedophile. And only the most despicable of human beings would accuse someone of being such, knowing they are not. There is nothing worse.
yes!We need a warning sign on tossed salad! I will never look at one the same again. I can also see me cracking up laughing if a waiter asks me if I want one.
Why is there no recording of him telling her what to do, where to go, who to see? 
This is so soap-operish sometimes. That Searcy guy is slimy.
