JennyMominRI
<font color=red>Live from Red Sox Nation<br><font
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2005
- Messages
- 12,433
I
I also don't understand why folks are saying that saying "Jesus" in the message might be not inclusive enough and hence offensive, but saying "God" is inclusive and hence not offensive. So by changing "Jesus" to "God" it seems that Muslims and Jews can be included. But what about everybody else? Obviously atheists, agnostics, unitarian universalists, people who are "spiritual" but don't believe in a higher being can't be included if we take "God" literally. I don't know how Buddhists or Hindus or Wiccans or Pagans take the word "God," but from the very sketchy knowledge I have of those religions, the it seems the literal meaning of "God" does not really seem to capture what practitioners of those religions believe in. (For instance, since "God" is singular, how could it possibly capture what a polytheist believes in? To include these views one would have to say "The Diety(ies) love you.")
.
and your absolutely right about that, which is why I think(hope) i said more inclusive?
You could say the *Divine * loves you too, but then people would wonder why Bette Middler was skywriting.