Jennifer Aniston on the Cover of GQ Magazine

[declansdad]

No, I'm not kidding. I do not think it takes confidence to pose nude. It is the act of someone who desperately desires attention.

I could only wish to be as attractive as she is, too. But even if I were, I would not pose nude on a magazine cover. I don't need that kind of validation.

We'll just have to agree to disagree.

I disagree. For someone to pose nude in our society, I believe they must be very comfortable with themselves. In order to be that way, they would need to be very confident.

 

[Planogirl]

I disagree. For someone to pose nude in our society, I believe they must be very comfortable with themselves. In order to be that way, they would need to be very confident.

I agree. I think that some people are very comfortable with doing something like this and others not so much. Some may do it for attention and some just because. I don't know her motive so it's hard to say IMO.

Mediocre talent? I guess so. I kind of respect most people who make a go of it in such a competitive job field. I kind of like Laura Croft too.

 

[Deb & Bill]

To me, it hardly looks like her. In the one photo, it must be a combination of the photos being very airbrushed and the tilt/angle of her head, but really, to me it could be someone else. confused3

You know, I was thinking the same thing. Even her smile didn't seem like any I had seen before. It was a strange photo.

 

[bumbershoot]

JA is HOT! I don't understand why people hate AJ so much???? She seems so giving - she literally gives millions of dollars to needy people.

I don't hate her, but I firmly believe that someday she's going to go off the deep end again, and take her young family with her. She just doesn't seem healthy, and having 3 babies SO fast, when she's as unhealthy as she already was, isn't good either.

And I think someday she's going to look back at their *paraphrasing* "we let the new kid(s) fully integrate into our family for a whopping 6 months before we bring someone else in" and wonder what on earth she was thinking. My dude is 4 years old, and while these years of mysterious lack of pregnancies have been a bummer, i can't even IMAGINE what it would have been like to bring in another even by the time he was 3. He's a handful and I would have been an absolute mess if more had shown up as my little plan thought would happen. Someday she'll look back at the speed at which she's adopted and had kids, and I certainly hope that SOON the adoption agencies will look at it, and not know what she was thinking.



I think JA is quite a good actress without distracting scary lips like a certain other actress. Does she take on good movies? Maybe not. But she is good in them, IMO.

 

[bicker]

You know, I was thinking the same thing. Even her smile didn't seem like any I had seen before.

I found a photo of Jennifer Aniston with that same exact smile on it. Google her, and search the images.

 

[720L]

I completley disagree. She has a beautiful body and she wanted to show it off. I don't think she's crying out for attention, so much as - see what 40 can look like!

What 40 can look like IF YOU HAVEN"T HAD A BABY YET. I'd look like that at 40 too if I hadn't had 2 kids (ok well not that good but it wouldn't have stretch marks and other things) and could sleep as long as I wanted and had the extra money for cosmetic procedures etc.

 

[bicker]

I think money does have a lot to do with it, but heck, a lot of rich, childless, 40 year old women of leisure don't look anywhere near as good as Jennifer Aniston looks.

Everything in perspective.

 

[rie'smom]

I just saw the pictures and bicker is right. The fact that she's rich does help because the "girls" aren't natural. Nobody at 40- baby or not- has a pair that look like grapefruits w/out some plastic surgery. Issac Newton's work with gravity proves that.

 

[declansdad]

Even stretch marks can be airbrushed.