kristen821 said:because we aren't responsible for the adults actions. We are responsible for our children.
Exactly! Glad some parents still get it!

kristen821 said:because we aren't responsible for the adults actions. We are responsible for our children.
maggs said:In my eyes my father was a monster and that is the first time I have ever said that. It has taken a lot to do so and it actually makes me weep having just got that out of my system.
Maggs
lw49033 said:Moreover, the "beating" part remains to be seen. I've met people--always women--who claimed to have been "beaten" when they were spanked less severely than I was--so it's a matter if interpretation to a point.
lw49033 said:I don't know your dad, so I am not going to contradict you. I will simply state that my mom, who paddled our butts with enthusiasm when we were bad, was no monster and no abuser.
lw49033 said:LOL. Children's Services will say anything that will put a buck in their pockets, and "child abuse" reports do just that. They get funding by caseload, so if there isn't enough abuse going on, they'll no doubt be happy to stretch the definition until there is.
Moreover, the fact that they want you to report at a certain level does not mean they can substantiate an abuse claim at that level--it simply means they want to take a look at the family. Still less does it mean they can build a criminal case on it.
I would suggest you look into a few cases like Hildreth v. Iowa DHS, Cobble v. Massachusetts DSS, Raboin v. North Dakota DHS, Calabretta v. Floyd, etc. because you seem to have an overly expansive view of the powers of child welfare workers. Parents do not even have to let a social worker in their house without a warrant or a bona fide emergency, I hope you realize that?
MAKmom said:TROLL! A Troll with experience with Children Services.
MAKmom said:TROLL! A Troll with experience with Children Services.
lw49033 said:7 is far too old? Wow, I was 15 when I got spanked last--and that was far from unusual in the town where I grew up.
chobie said:Just as it is absurd to say that any smacking/spanking rises to the level of abuse, it is equally absurd to say that not spanking your kids will lead to juvenile delinquency.
jackskellingtonsgirl said:What on earth could a teen possibly learn from being spanked?
lw49033 said:I hope you realize that a "regular spanking expected in ordered discipline" is also not child abuse, unless the kid is getting beaten black and blue or something like that.
We're "regular" spankers, raised by regular spankers, and doing quite all right.
birdiesunshine said:Hmmm if you are spanking "regularly" I assume it's not working for you. Or do you just like spanking "regularly"??
lw49033 said:What I learned is that I was still under my mom's control and had to obey her rules as long as I wanted to live in her house. I also learned that she loved me enough to risk making me angry with her when she felt I was taking a wrong step. Not bad things to learn, are they?
birdiesunshine said:Hmmm if you are spanking "regularly" I assume it's not working for you. Or do you just like spanking "regularly"??
lw49033 said:I'll ignore the implied insult and answer: a spanking is as "regular" as the misbehavior which is known to be spankable. In the context I said it, "regular" was being contrasted with "a swat for safety reasons" or something like that. If the kids do something that earns a spanking, they get a spanking--as a punishment, not because there's an immediate safety problem or because we don't know what else to do.
VSL said:If you need to spank regularly though then surely it means that it's not all that effective![]()