It does appear Henpecked Harry is an enabler but that doesn’t absolve Mean Meg of her horrible behaviors. She’s almost forty years old and soon to be the mother of two. Time to own her **** and grow up.
I think this is to even out Harry's interview with James Corden. Now they both had time alone, and time together. Except Meghan got more time and more serious time.
), I really hope she didn't say that bearing in mind she complained TO THE MEDIA that no one was asking her if she was OK! I imagine her friends and family were asking her. I would hope Harry was! 
While true, it’s more her/them that’s all over the media. They seek it out, having a PR team and lawyers who speak for them, as well as doing things to blatantly promote themselves (after blaming the media for their woes) like a no-holds-barred Oprah Winfrey interview and the James Cordon show, etc. They are working hard to keep themselves relevant riding the coattails of the RF whom they have little problem trashing in the media even though they’ve been very patient and giving to them. Their hypocrisy and tone-deafness are the things that people are reacting so negatively to, and they can’t or won’t see it because they are too selfish and arrogant to look past their own desires. I suspect this interview is only going to intensify peoples’ dislike for them, and I’m glad their former employees’ voices are finally being heard, too. Not much of it is new news, but the picture is becoming more complete now. And that is much their own doing. Had they gone off and lived a quiet life of privacy like they said they were going to do, all of this likely would’ve stayed under the rug. People have a right to defend themselves.
), since it's been hard for Meghan and him and they, at least, have each other.
The stories about her abusive treatment of the staff are not new. Bits and pieces trickled out, even as it took place. People noticed that she kept losing staff, who had been with the family for some time. Reports say that when she was told "we do not treat the staff that way/you shouldn't treat staff that way," her response was, "It's not my job to coddle them." What a diva. Those employees are said to have signed NDAs, so they are limited in what they can say, but Meghan can spin all she wants.I know! I keep hoping this isn't true - that Harry didn't really say it!
I also hope Meghan didn't really say it isn't her job "to coddle people", bearing in mind she was complaining TO THE MEDIA that no one was asking her if she was OK!
It’s just not going to happen. Of course, afterwards there will be people who claim they made direct attacks on the queen, because there seems to be a certain segment who think everything H&M do is a direct attack on the queen. But to a casual observer like me, I think the palace has done themselves a disservice with all the recent insider statements and the launch of the investigation.* It’s now getting news coverage and has only made me more interested in tuning in to the H&M interview whereas previously it didn’t seem interesting enough to appeal to me.
Have you seen the promos?
Or rather they waited because they didn't want to damage a royal's reputation. Imagine that, the palace courtiers not wanting to create a public scandal... That's actually the issue that's being complained about here. They've been shielding Meghan all this time. The palace's failure to protect staff from an abusive royal is what the core of this complaint is about, and what Buckingham Palace is now investigating.
Just what’s been discussed here and the clips that have made it to CNN.
If by “they” you mean the palace as a whole, well then they’ve only served to damage their own reputation by participating in a cover-up. If the concerns were brought up two years ago, then the palace had an ethical obligation to investigate this two years ago. Because now it’s both a scandal and a cover-up, which is not a good look for any of them.
