Kim♥DISNEY;41888888 said:
I could be wrong since I have read this somewhere, but don't have data to support me ... but 1% of the population controls 40% of the money in the U.S. However, the other 99% who only control 60% (the middle class) pay almost double ... if not more in taxes.
I am all for a flat tax (which is what the two senators Obama commissioned about a year ago stated in their report ... their flat tax would be 23% ... much lower than what I pay now.)
Actually, from a taxes perspective, it's the top 5% of earners who pay more than half of all income taxes in the country, the bottom 50% don't pay any...
WHO PAYS TAXES, AND HOW MUCH DO THEY PAY?
Percentiles by AGI || AGI Threshold || % of Fed Personal Income Tax
____________________________________________________________
Top 1%........................$380,354..........................38.02
Top 5%........................$159,619..........................58.72
Top 10%......................$113,799...........................69.94
.
Top 25%......................$67,280.............................86.34
Top 50%......................$33,048.............................97.30
Bottom 50%................<$33,048...............................2.7
SOURCE: 2008 IRS REVENUE DATA, COMPILED BY NTU.
======================================================
As you can see, the top 1% are those with incomes of $380k/year, well off, but not "super rich" especially when you consider that they're probably not living in Colby, KS where the COL is super low.
I would completely agree with a flat tax, remove all deductions, as well as the EIC, and go with a straight flat tax.
Corporate welfare is another issue, and is given for 1 of 2 reasons:
1. Because a politician is playing "You scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" for campain contributions, cushy lobbying jobs for family, whatever's legal
or
2. Because the gubmint is trying to influence what we buy or how we live, they do this so that the recipient of said welfare can undercut their competitors on price due to the funding coming in. See the CFL and GE situation for a great example of this...