Galahad
.....an appointment
- Joined
- May 22, 2000
- Messages
- 11,464
That said, how can those of you supporting Bush say that an attack would not affect your vote ? I've seen any number of people saying that the fact that he's doing such a good job in the war on terror is the main reason they're voting for him. So, if he completely fails in that and a major attack is carried out, how could you then ignore that and continue to vote for him ?
Haven't read all of the intervening posts, but this kind of negates the complaining by the left about the right saying that the Dems are setting them selves up so that they benefit only when really bad things happen. You assume that I expect any president to guarantee that an attack will never happen. That's not rational. It would more defensible to say that, even when we are attacked again, that we likely prevented several attacks and/or reduced their ability to attack us by virtue of the administration's policies.