Most likely yes but there are certainly other factors if you were going to hold the contract such as dues and rentability.
Dues at GFV are nearly identical to BLT. Nobody would pay $30 more per point to save 9 cents in dues. It would take over 300 years to break even.
And I doubt there is a single buyer ever who said, “I really prefer BLT over GFV, but I think I’ll pay the extra $30 for GFV, and lose 11 month booking for my preferred resort, because if I ever want to rent out my points, it might be slightly easier to rent out my GFV points.”
Sure BLT rents well but to your same point most outsiders would prefer to rent VGF than BLT.
Because most people see GFV as superior.
But hold on, if GFV has such great availability within the 7 month window, then there would be no preference to renting GFV points. People could just rent SSR points and use them at GFV at 7 months.
Or, are you suggesting GFV availability is already limited at GFV?! Even though it has unrestricted points?!?!
And if 7 month availability is already so tight, won’t that get even worse, based on your logic?!?
So the problem you predict for Riviera, ALREADY exists for several unrestricted resorts??
With VDH and PVB I'm so glad they are back to adding the 2nd and 3rd bathrooms.
Depending on how many people are going that is a reason we book BLT over VGF.
Absolutely. But if that was an ongoing preference, not a mere isolated trip, then they would have purchased BLT.