I am more disturbed

I honestly don't understand the hang-up on the word "marriage"--for either side. To me it's just a word.

Maybe everything should be called a civil union in the eyes of the law and then if the individuals want to refer to themselves as married, that's up to them.

As a Catholic, had I not married in the Catholic Church, and the church didn't recognize my marriage, I would still feel "married".

I guess that I go back and forth between agreeing with holding out for the principal of it and thinking that you should take what concession you can get for the time being and keep working for more.

As for legal rights, many of the legal rights mentioned along this thread aren't necessarily rock solid for heterosexual married couples. If it's an issue really important to you, anyone is going to tell you to make sure you have it legally documented. If you want your spouse to have the right to make medical decisions, you're going to want it in writing. The case in Florida being the perfect example.
 
Originally posted by tonyswife
Thank you. I sometimes wonder if I make sense to anyone. :D
You're preaching to the choir here. You saved me a lot of typing tonight. :)
 
Originally posted by kbeverina
You're preaching to the choir here. You saved me a lot of typing tonight. :)

LOL!

I think this topic is fascinating, politically speaking. It is a perfect example of why a pure democracy is a bad idea.
 
I agree completely kbeverina. It never even occurred to me that marriage was anything but the union of 2 people in love.
 

Originally posted by ripleysmom
I agree completely kbeverina. It never even occurred to me that marriage was anything but the union of 2 people in love.

from a religious perspective, it is. From the law's perspective, feelings are irrelevant, as as far as the law is concerned, it's a contractual living arrangement between two people of the opposite sex. If churches want to sanction gay marriages, fine. If states want to legalize gay marriages, fine. If states want to legalize civil unions for gays, fine. Just don't tell me that TODAY it is a denial of rights or discrimination issue. Because the way the laws are written in most states, it's neither. Nor should this be something Federal Govt should have any involvement in.
 
Originally posted by Deb & Bill
I'm sad to see our country of so-called Christians becoming more and more intolerant of diversity. Prayer in school is wonderful to many until it includes a prayer to Allah or Buddha. Didn't Jesus Christ say that to love God was the greatest commandment and to love your neighbor as you love yourself the second greatest commandment? How can we profess to follow Jesus Christ if we don't love all people? How can we deny rights to others - isn't that what our country was built on?

I'm not endorsing allowing others to murder or rape and not be punished for it, but how can we deny others their rights as long as they don't impact our rights?

I'm concerned about a conservative trend that wants everyone to be like them, worship their god, live the way they live, etc.

When they start to legislate marriage, how long will it take until they go further and legislate who can marry?

I'm sorry, what state do you live in. I'm not aware of any public school that permits ANY prayer at all. I too agree, any form of prayer is fine too. But where I live (NJ) none is allowed!

-Tony

Why are we more concerned about marriage instead of educating our youth so that they can grow up to be leaders in the world instead of tyrants and bigots?
 
Originally posted by ripleysmom
"How about yours?"

My marriage was done to affirm my commitment to my husband and to legalize my union. Now I am legally protected in ways that a homosexual couple cannot hope to achieve even if they go to a lawyer and make arrangements.

Would it upset you after your death if your spouse was not allowed to keep your home or your children (if you have any)?

Dear Ripley's Mom your last paragraph is just nonsense.

1) Loss of the house? Ever hear of a will. I John Smith leave all of my worldly possesions to Joe Blow (No pun intended), including the residence at 123 Primose Lane.

2) Hmmmm. Children..... Lets se if we are a gay couple how did we get them? (Adoption - High Probability, Artificial Insemination [for Lesbian Couple] - High Probability, Donor Sperm [again for Lesbian Couple - High Probability, Kidnap - Low Probability, Spontaneous Generation - Low Probability) Who will fight for the 'possession' of the children? The donors? The 'Grandparents' Happens in the Hetero world all the time. Use legal measures. Adoption, In your will assign guardians (We did, that's why we have G-d Parents, oopps forgot anything with the word G-d is inherently evil!

Come on, your points are all non-issues. When people make up false reasons and fight so arduently over them, a red flag goes up in my head (and boy does that ever hurt!) and gives me another reason to oppose Gay Marriage.

Finally, I probably would not be too upset, as I would already be dead. But I get your point.

-Tony
 
Originally posted by tonyswife
Repeat after me, the constitution does not GIVE me rights and that the bill of rights are not the only rigts I have as a free human.

Actually tonyswife (and I thought we agreed never to 'fight' in public again ;) ) If I remember correctly the Constitution recognizes certain G-d Given, inalienable rights in the preamble, and then specifies 10 very important and specific rights (not all inclusive) in the bill of rights.

This is not yet over. There will be appeals all the way to the supreme court. I expect one day we will have civil unions, with full legal protection, and I will work towards that. You also know why I oppose the term marriage in these unions, and I will work to prevent that from ocurring as well.

We usually agree, and I hope you know how much I respect you and your views. However, even if a ban Christianity bill, or restart of Slavery bill is introduced, it can never survive a court challenge, even a *GASP*:earseek: 'Bush Supreme Challenge'

It is very ironic how anyone who twists the facts and denigrates the Homesexual community is branded (correctly) a homophobe or a bigot, but then when Special interest groups, Homosexuals included, spread fear, inuendo and frank lies about, oh say a Bush appointee to a Federal, or Supreme Court Judgeship, it is the end of the world as we know it.

Come on people. The democrats have blocked every Federal Judge appointment for the last 4 years. They will block every Supreme court appointment as well. Remember Clarence Thomas, he has made several rulings against the Right wing Christian Conservatives.

Stop spreading fear and hatred, that the other side seizes upon, it becomes a vicious circle, a catch 22.

-Tony
 
Originally posted by tonyswife
It was, until everyone willy nilly started proposing constitutional amendments. I don't know if the gay community percipitated this move, but it has gotten out of hand. To be sure, the gay community's extremists do not help their cause. I mean the people that have the pride parades, running naked through San Francisco in the name of "pride" (I'm gonna get flamed wicked bad for that one)

Minor heat, no flame intended.

Let's see if I understand this one.

People who honestly believe homosexuality is a sin, do not have the right to speak their mind (1st Ammendment). I agree they cannot do anything about thier views, disctiminate, violence, burn crosses, etc. But you state they can not express their views about something they feel 'has gotten out of hand'

You (specific) feel gay rights should include marriage and have the right to say so. However, you also have the right to point out a 'sub-class' of gays have a behavior that is not helpful. In fact that they have 'gotten out of hand'. The difference in your 'criticism' seems to be one of small degree.

Bluntly, why can you point out that some Gay's actions (in your opinion) are hurting the cause, but I can't say, sorry I don't support Gay Marriage, or even I don't approve of your life style (said to make a point only). Who really cares if I approve? Who really cares what you think about some Homosexuals?

Before you (specific) think about adding rights for others, I respectfully submit you support certain rights that already exist for all of us. Freedom of speech does not mean you have to like what is said. I support the American Nazis and Communists rights of assembly and free speech, I will never support their messages or goals.

-Tony
 
Originally posted by snarfer1
Dear Ripley's Mom your last paragraph is just nonsense.

1) Loss of the house? Ever hear of a will. I John Smith leave all of my worldly possesions to Joe Blow (No pun intended), including the residence at 123 Primose Lane.

2) Hmmmm. Children..... Lets se if we are a gay couple how did we get them? (Adoption - High Probability, Artificial Insemination [for Lesbian Couple] - High Probability, Donor Sperm [again for Lesbian Couple - High Probability, Kidnap - Low Probability, Spontaneous Generation - Low Probability) Who will fight for the 'possession' of the children? The donors? The 'Grandparents' Happens in the Hetero world all the time. Use legal measures. Adoption, In your will assign guardians (We did, that's why we have G-d Parents, oopps forgot anything with the word G-d is inherently evil!

Come on, your points are all non-issues. When people make up false reasons and fight so arduently over them, a red flag goes up in my head (and boy does that ever hurt!) and gives me another reason to oppose Gay Marriage.

Finally, I probably would not be to upset, as I would already be dead. But I get your point.

-Tony

First one thing: I’m not talking about marriage (hetero or gay), I'm talking about civil unions here. So here I go:
1) A will can be easily contested and revoked by the family members of the deceased.
2) In the “hetero world” as you call it; the surviving parent immediately has the legal guardianship of the child. Again, a will can be easily contested and revoked by the family members of the deceased.
I know that wills are contested everyday not just in the “gay world”. But in the courts the rights of the hetero partner are valued more than those of a gay one.
 
"Dear Ripley's Mom your last paragraph is just nonsense."

Um...no it's not. TheAnswr also pointed that out to you too but you ignored it.


"1) Loss of the house? Ever hear of a will. I John Smith leave all of my worldly possesions to Joe Blow (No pun intended), including the residence at 123 Primose Lane."

In a perfect world that might be but Courts have set aside wills in favor of the decedent's family. Your will can be challenged by any blood relative, did you know that? The only person that has supreme undeniable right to property is a spouse.


"2) Hmmmm. Children..... Lets se if we are a gay couple how did we get them? (Adoption - High Probability, Artificial Insemination [for Lesbian Couple] - High Probability, Donor Sperm [again for Lesbian Couple - High Probability, Kidnap - Low Probability, Spontaneous Generation - Low Probability) Who will fight for the 'possession' of the children? The donors? The 'Grandparents' Happens in the Hetero world all the time. Use legal measures. Adoption, In your will assign guardians (We did, that's why we have G-d Parents, oopps forgot anything with the word G-d is inherently evil!"

Um...Tony has it escaped your attention that in addition to the fact that 2 people of the same sex cannot marry, they also cannot both be parents. Guardianship is nice but again there is no blood relationship. If someone with a firmer "legal" relationship comes along that child can be taken away.

Also your point about how the child came to be is nothing more than extraneous information. Would those circumstances of birth count to you if it were a heterosexual couple?


"Come on, your points are all non-issues. When people make up false reasons and fight so arduently over them, a red flag goes up in my head (and boy does that ever hurt!) and gives me another reason to oppose Gay Marriage."

Wow pretty polite way to call me a liar!! How would you know that they are false reasons? I am not the only person telling you these things on this thread.

My reasons are very much issues thank you.


"Finally, I probably would not be to upset, as I would already be dead. But I get your point."

Well thanks for getting my point but it's not just when you're dead.

Did you also know that even with all of the legal wrangling in the world, a same sex partner can be prevented from making medical decisions for their SO? Did you know that they can be barred from seeing them in ICU? That they can be excluded from receiving any medical information about their partner?
 
"I'm sorry, what state do you live in. I'm not aware of any public school that permits ANY prayer at all. I too agree, any form of prayer is fine too. But where I live (NJ) none is allowed!"

Actually there is no school sponsored prayer but I think that you will find that children are allowed to get together to pray if they so choose.
 
Did you also know that even with all of the legal wrangling in the world, a same sex partner can be prevented from making medical decisions for their SO? Did you know that they can be barred from seeing them in ICU? That they can be excluded from receiving any medical information about their partner?

They can, at any point, make each other the legal/health DPOA of each other and then that won't happen.
 
Let me just say that in a country that is waging a non-winnable war in Iraq, a country whose jobs are being outsourced to other nations, a country with serious health care, education, and a plethora of other problems.....

..... I find it absolutely ridiculous and embarrassing and infuriating that the government would waste time and money on defining marriage. Talk about a red herring...... in the grand scheme of things, WHY the heck is it SO important to so many of you to trample on the feelings of gays? :confused:
 
Originally posted by ripleysmom
"Dear Ripley's Mom your last paragraph is just nonsense."

Um...no it's not. TheAnswr also pointed that out to you too but you ignored it.


"1) Loss of the house? Ever hear of a will. I John Smith leave all of my worldly possesions to Joe Blow (No pun intended), including the residence at 123 Primose Lane."

In a perfect world that might be but Courts have set aside wills in favor of the decedent's family. Your will can be challenged by any blood relative, did you know that? The only person that has supreme undeniable right to property is a spouse.


"2) Hmmmm. Children..... Lets se if we are a gay couple how did we get them? (Adoption - High Probability, Artificial Insemination [for Lesbian Couple] - High Probability, Donor Sperm [again for Lesbian Couple - High Probability, Kidnap - Low Probability, Spontaneous Generation - Low Probability) Who will fight for the 'possession' of the children? The donors? The 'Grandparents' Happens in the Hetero world all the time. Use legal measures. Adoption, In your will assign guardians (We did, that's why we have G-d Parents, oopps forgot anything with the word G-d is inherently evil!"

Um...Tony has it escaped your attention that in addition to the fact that 2 people of the same sex cannot marry, they also cannot both be parents. Guardianship is nice but again there is no blood relationship. If someone with a firmer "legal" relationship comes along that child can be taken away.

Also your point about how the child came to be is nothing more than extraneous information. Would those circumstances of birth count to you if it were a heterosexual couple?


"Come on, your points are all non-issues. When people make up false reasons and fight so arduently over them, a red flag goes up in my head (and boy does that ever hurt!) and gives me another reason to oppose Gay Marriage."

Wow pretty polite way to call me a liar!! How would you know that they are false reasons? I am not the only person telling you these things on this thread.

My reasons are very much issues thank you.


"Finally, I probably would not be to upset, as I would already be dead. But I get your point."

Well thanks for getting my point but it's not just when you're dead.

Did you also know that even with all of the legal wrangling in the world, a same sex partner can be prevented from making medical decisions for their SO? Did you know that they can be barred from seeing them in ICU? That they can be excluded from receiving any medical information about their partner?

Dear Ripleymom I never intended to imply or call you a liar. If you or anyone took it that way I am sorry. However, I stand by my statement that your points are and remain nonsense. And yes I always read what ThAnswer has to say. While we usually disagree, I do respect her positions and thoughts.

Sorry if wills can be contested in the Gay world. Guess what they are also contested in the Straight world. With proper planning the effects of a contest can be negated. Nonissue. You want change, deal with the Lawyers, especially the vast majority in our Congress. Spousal rights depend on the state where you live, some recognize 'common law' relationships, some don't. Spousal rights are not an absolute, except with regards to retirement plans. Sorry.

Children, (This is from memory, I will search for a link) In NJ a lesbian couple had a child (AI), the non-genetic Mom adopted the child and sucessfully sued for visitation when the couple broke up. In the real world, parents have their children taken away all the time (DYFS in the case of NJ). Again a non-issue, but of all the issues, comes close to actually being an issue, especially if I misquoted/misremembered this example!

The issues of birth do count, adoptions being reversed after 3 years by a birth 'Father', switched babies being returned to the actual parents, wrong egg AI suits, so sorry again a Non-issue.

The ICU statement is blatently false period. A document called the Duarable Healthcare Power of Attorney can give irrevokable rights for the decisions of an individual's healthcare to another party, regardless of the relationship.

Barring a person from hospital visits would not only take legal action and an enforcement action, but would take so much time, that the person would recover or sucumb from/to their illness before it became an issue. TOTALLY BOGUS POINT.

Under HIPAA Protected Healthcare Information can not be shared without the prior consent of the patient, excepting Treatment, Payment and Healthcare Operations matters. Non Point.

So, I'm sorry we disagree, and that from my point of view, in this post most of your 'points' are invalid. But that does not mean I'm calling you a liar, you are not, you are a committed person, working hard for what she believes in, that doesn't make you correct, nor does that makes us enemies.

-Tony
 
Originally posted by bubie2.5
First one thing: I’m not talking about marriage (hetero or gay), I'm talking about civil unions here. So here I go:
1) A will can be easily contested and revoked by the family members of the deceased.
2) In the “hetero world” as you call it; the surviving parent immediately has the legal guardianship of the child. Again, a will can be easily contested and revoked by the family members of the deceased.
I know that wills are contested everyday not just in the “gay world”. But in the courts the rights of the hetero partner are valued more than those of a gay one.


Well, it seems to me then that the people that would be contesting any legal document would be your own family members. They are the ones then that need to accept the relationship and not the world around them.

I'm certainly not going to contest the will of a perfect stranger because he wants to leave everything to his partner.

So why should people who do not agree with the lifestyle be forced by law to accept something that is really a family issue?
 
To all those that are opposed to gay marriage, I would love to ask you a very simple question. If I live in the same country as you, and I pay the same taxes (and to be perfectly frank, we likely pay quite a bit more than the average household), and we vote, and we never break the law, then how come I am not entitled to the same rights as you? It's a simple question. I am as much of an American as you are.

But whatever the case may be, you will find some reason why I should be treated less fairly. I've no doubt of that. I have every confidence that you will find a way to twist the words of OUR Constitution to explain why I am less of a citizen. I won't be shocked. Trust me, I've heard it all. And yes, if you were in front of me, you would most definitely hear a little disgust in my tone of voice.

All that said, to those that have expressed interest, my wedding plans are going swimmingly! In mid-October of 2005, Joe and I have decided that we're going to fly to Toronto for a private ceremony with my younger brother and his wife and Joe's best friend and his wife as well. They'll serve as our Best Men and witnesses. We'll spend a quiet weekend enjoying the sights and sounds of Toronot.

Then, either that same weekend or the one following, we're going to host our reception in Manhattan. A relatively small one with about 75 guests. We'll start with a cocktail hour with a sake station, a champagne station, a signature cocktail (cosmo anyone?) beer and wine, soda and juice for the little ones, and passing hors douvres.

Then we'll move into the dining area for dinner. Our Best Men will give their toasts, yadda, yadda. Dinner will be buffet. I wanted a sit down thing with waiter service, but Joe wanted the buffet. He won. Anyway, we figure a chicken dish, a beef dish, three vegetables, the basics. But with a NYC flashy touch.

Immediately after dinner, Joe and I will stand to make our own toast to our families and friends. I already have in mind what we're going to say and it will be something like, "Thank you all for coming, not only to celebrate our 15 year anniversary, but for being here for our marriage. Each of you are so special to us in different ways. Some are family (raise glass to brothers, sisters, uncles, etc...), and some old friends (another glass raise to them). We had hoped to be married here, in our own country, but we were unable. We flew to Toronto and now we are official! And we wanted to celebrate with you. You were with us through all of our good times, some of you listened when we went through our bad times. And you are all with us today through the best time yet. So this reception is NOT for Joe and I. We want you to know that this day is as much for us as it is for you all. We love all of you and we look forward to spending the rest of our lives together, with you each by our side."

And then we're going to tell them that we didn't want a "first dance" but we did want to do something special and that we selected a song for EVERYONE to dance WITH us. And then we'll play, "I Hope You Dance."

We'll also have a cake. Joe has his heart set on a strawberry shortcake thing with whipped cream frosting. I'm not a cake guy so I'll let him handle that. And no, we don't want two little men standing on the top. I'd probably laugh myself senseless.

Then the rest of the night will be fun and frivolity. Lots of laughs. Some emotion. But best of all, we'll be with our loved ones.

A few other things that we're planning on is to state that we do NOT want gifts. If anyone is compelled to offer anything, we've selected three different charities that we'd prefer they donate to: American Diabetes Associaion, American Heart Association and City Harvest

Quick question for the wedding planners out there. I wanted to give something special to our guests. I happen to be half Japanese so I thought we'd give everyone a nice set of laquer or wood chopsticks and porcelain chopstick rests. I thought it'd be a nice reference to my own heritage. Joe loves the idea. What do you think?

Anyway, that's our plan for now.

And if these plans threaten anyone's own marriage, I'm gonna point at ya, snicker, and mutter "Oh gimme a friggin' break."
 
I’m responding to 13 pages so be prepared for a long, long post. I’m going to cover it all. This is not directed to everybody here, but I’m sure some of you will know I’m responding to your posts.

I believe that everybody has a right to their opinions, regardless of how bigoted those opinions may be. The point that you cross a line is when you want to use that bigotry to take discriminating action against a group of people. I won’t stand by and let you. You can hate us, declare of morally bankrupt, and wish with everything in you that homosexuals didn’t exist. But the point in which you support legislation to eliminate human rights is the point in which I will fight you every step of the way. Your opinion only counts as long as you don’t force your opinion on me. I want the right to marry my partner. My having that right doesn’t affect you. Your having a negative opinion doesn’t affect me. Your taking action against my right does affect me. Worry about your own life and what happens in your marriage. You need to keep your religion and your politics out of my life and out of my bedroom.

I’m about sick to death of people who use the slippery slope argument to justify their bigoted beliefs. You’re afraid that if homosexuals can marry then other people will want the right to marry their dogs, their children, their cousins, or their automobiles. First of all, I think I can promise you here and now that no sane person will ever ask to marry their car. Obsessions with inanimate objects are fetishes, which are mental illnesses. Homosexuality is NOT a mental illness. If you seriously think it is possible that the law will allow such marriages then medication is in order as is treatment for paranoid personality disorder. Second of all, I also think I can promise you that the law will never allow for a marriage that involves a victim. Since children and animals can’t consent to sex, I seriously think you can stop worrying about such things. Third of all, the law isn’t likely to allow two people to marry if their gene pools are so similar that the odds of producing sick children are too high. That would probably discount father/daughter and perhaps even sibling marriages. Beyond that, I don’t give a **** who marries whom, and neither should the law. If first cousins fall in love and want to marry, then why should we tell them no? If some dude wants three wives, and those wives are old enough to know what they are doing, then who are we to judge?

Another thing, there is NO evidence whatsoever that the “slippery slope” fears have manifested in other countries that allow gay marriage. I’ve sure not seen evidence of this. I have friends in all the Scandinavian countries and I e-mailed all of them this question earlier today and they have all responded like it was a big joke! Of course people don’t want to marry cars or children or siblings! What kind of idiot would suggest such a thing? Don’t worry, I didn’t give them names!

Oh, and to whoever suggested marriage is only about the “warm fuzzies,” give me a frickin’ break! Is that really all you think it is about? Here’s a real-life situation for you if you think it’s just about the warm fuzzies. I own a house. It’s only in my name, not my partner’s. Together, the two of us could buy a much nicer home. My house is nice, it’s just that it’s way out in the country because that is where property was cheap enough so that I could have the house I wanted. On my income alone, I could never get a nice house in town. Our combined incomes could purchase our dream house easily. One problem. I would NEVER buy a house with her. Why? Because she has an adult daughter who would think nothing of taking the house from me in the event her mother passed on. And since my partner is 17 years older than I am, there’s a pretty good chance that I could find myself paying lawyers everything I have to save my home and still lose it! Why? Because that “warm fuzzy” feeling isn’t going to be enough to keep her daughter from trying to steal my house! Now if we were married, it would be all but impossible for her daughter to contest a will successfully. Yes, it COULD happen, but it would be very unlikely. Without marriage, it would be inevitable. And yes, I do know of cases where this has happened, even when wills were made. If two people aren’t married, the biological children have more power than the will…at least that is my experience of watching the partner’s of two deceased friends trying to sort out such messes.

Last month I had to have a triple hernia repair. Because I was alert going into the surgery, I was able to request my partner’s presence. But had it been emergency surgery, technically speaking, the nurses would have had to refuse my partner. Real warm and fuzzy, isn’t it?

Let’s move on to the those who think homosexuality is a choice. I was born to heterosexual parents in a right-wing conservative midwest town. I didn’t even know what a homosexual was when I started feeling attracted to the female body. I can remember being five to six years old and sneaking the Sears catalog into my room so I could look at the pretty woman wearing the scanty bras! Tell me that a six year old made the choice to like women. Oh, and my oldest brother eventually came out too. Do you honestly think we both made that choice? Or could it be possible that my parents carried a recessive gene and passed it on to both my brother and me?

One more thing, I was a biology/psychology major in college. I once took a class called behavioral genetics. The professor was a conservative right-wing jerk who was despised by everybody for being such a conservative presence in a liberal college. But I’ll tell you one thing…this conservative professor insisted that homosexuality was genetically passed from parent to child. Even he believed it to be genetic, despite his conservative ways. Many, if not most biologists and behaviorists believe there is a strong genetic component to everything we do. There’s evidence that supports this with many behaviors, but not all…only because the genes have yet to be isolated. It’s just a matter of time.

There are fascinating twin studies that support the “homosexuality is genetic” argument. There are studies of twins separated at birth that show a tendency for both end up gay or both end up straight. In monozygotic twins, there is an even higher likelihood that both will be homosexual, even when they were raised in different households thousands of miles apart! How can you seriously say it’s a choice?!!!? And I know from personal experience how common it is for parents to have more than one gay child. I know many, many lesbians and gay men who have gay siblings. Very, very common. It’s also very common for gay kids to have gay aunts or uncles. There is a very clear genetic connection, like it or not.

Another thing. I’ve heard it hypothesized many times that homosexuals do play an important role in the natural world, the same role as infertile men and women: population control. If even five percent of the population didn’t procreate because of homosexuality, that is one huge amount of people not being born. Unfortunately, mother nature didn’t assume that BIGOTS would drive so many gay people into “playing straight” and having babies anyway. Imagine, though, if worldwide people would stop letting religion rule them and just let homosexuals be homosexuals. We would indeed help keep populations lower. That isn’t a bad thing when you look at the current growth rate on our planet. Like infertile men and woman, homosexuals should have every right to marry and find happiness, even if they don’t produce any children.

As far as the Anne Heche comment…that woman is bisexual (as well as bipolar). Bisexuals like both genders. That means they might date a woman one time and a man the next. A homosexual can’t do that! You want me to marry a man? Be prepared to watch me vomit at the alter when he tries to kiss me. Yes, I’m as grossed out at the thought of “being” with the opposite gender as you are of being with the same gender.

Let me ask those of you who think it’s a choice one question. Could you EVER make the choice to be with somebody of your own sex? Or would you feel sick at the idea? If you get ill at the thought of forcing an attraction that is unnatural to you, then why on earth do you think gay people can force themselves to be attracted to the same gender? And why, why, why would they want to???? Why would any little girl who likes boys wake up one day and say, “gee, it’s a nice Tuesday afternoon…I think I’m going to force myself to like girls today…just for the hell of it!” Does that really make any sense?

And no, I’ve never been abused by any man and I had a wonderful relationship with my father and my brothers. There is nothing to make me not like men. Nothing except GENETICS. If fact, some of my closest friends are guys. I like guys fine as friends, but I’d rather die than be intimate with one! Yuck!

That is all.
 
So why should people who do not agree with the lifestyle be forced by law to accept something that is really a family issue?

I'm sorry but it is NOT a family issue.
If something were to happen to you (God forbid) is safe to say your husband would get custody of your kids (no matter if his in laws like it or not) as long as he is fit to do so. That's not the case for gay parents, where wills can easily being contested and revoked.
 
Originally posted by ripleysmom
by this country's apparent endorsement of discrimination than I am by the results of the election and that is saying a lot.

Me too! I can say that I am proud to be from Massachusetts, where we are trailblazers, though:D Also, I believe in my heart that someday in my lifetime discrimination against gay marriage will seem as unthinkable as segregation.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom