I posted this link in another thread, but in case someone here didn't see it and is interested:
http://med-owl.com/health/H5N1-Virus-Therapy.html
http://med-owl.com/health/H5N1-Virus-Therapy.html

luvwinnie said:If it's a LIVE virus vaccine, I believe pregnant woman wouldn't be able to take it...or perhaps it would still be better than "Taking the chances", but it would be risky. People with autoimmune disease (like me) and those on immunsuppressant drugs also shouldn't have LIVE vaccines.
Actually the 1918 pandemic attacked healthy adults most. The reason give was they had the strongest immune systems and those immune systems went overboard and caused more deaths.poohandwendy said:I voted the elderly because from what I have read, they are at most risk...people with weakened immune systems being the next in line.
UnderTheMistletoe said:Military should be the option and should be the first to get any vaccine. Many of our troops are actively deployed to areas of the world where Bird Fluhas already been found. Assuming that it could mutate and pass person-to-person, they could infect entire cities in no time at all. Anyone ever consider how many military personnel are stationed in and right outside of Washington, DC?
The reason it hit the military so hard was the age of the recruits. They were late teens and early 20s. They had the strongest immune systems. See my post above for why that was a problem.N.Bailey said:You have a very good point. Check back to the 1918 epidemic and see how it originally was passed. It spread rapidly thru our military while the government was reassuring the rest of the country that it wasn't going to hit the public sector. IMO, should this become another pandemic, I fully believe this lie will repeat itself all over again.
mickeyfan2 said:The reason it hit the military so hard was the age of the recruits. They were late teens and early 20s. They had the strongest immune systems. See my post above for why that was a problem.
LoveMyDVC2 said:I have actually given this a lot of thought!!
As a mother of 2, I voted adults, with the thought that parents can keep their children indoors. I know that is my plan if the Bird Flu does happen. I would NOT let my kids out for any reason!!! I would need to be vaccinated so that I could go and get food, meds, and things for them when we ran out.
If the very young and elderly were vaccinated, who would take care of them later. Also if by vaccinating 18-50 age group, would allow for the working to keep working. This may sound cold but, why vaccinate an 70 year old retired
person with maybe 10+ years left. (if they are lucky)
Hold on...let me get my flame suite on!!!
LoveMyDVC2 said:I have actually given this a lot of thought!!
As a mother of 2, I voted adults, with the thought that parents can keep their children indoors. I know that is my plan if the Bird Flu does happen. I would NOT let my kids out for any reason!!! I would need to be vaccinated so that I could go and get food, meds, and things for them when we ran out.
If the very young and elderly were vaccinated, who would take care of them later. Also if by vaccinating 18-50 age group, would allow for the working to keep working. This may sound cold but, why vaccinate an 70 year old retired
person with maybe 10+ years left. (if they are lucky)
Hold on...let me get my flame suite on!!!
Puffy2 said:It wouldn't have anything to do with "age" at all. It would have more to do with where the problem areas are, density of population, etc.... In other words, big cities first (if they were in high risk locations).
Immunosuppressed are usually vaccinated first.