laurajetter
Mouseketeer<br><Font color="red">The Tag Fairy thi
- Joined
- May 19, 2004
- Messages
- 2,225
I was in a minor fender bender on 6/1. It was heavily raining and the car behind me rear-ended my car as we were both slowing down for a traffic light. My 9-month old was in his car seat, and everything I've ever read or heard (including the officer who was at the scene) says that a car seat should be replaced after any accident (actually, the officer said it should be replaced in any accident over 5 mph).
The bottom edge of my license plate was bent a little, and there are a few minor scratched when inspected closely, but no major damage. We do not intend on having any repairs made to the car, we just want reimbursement for the car seat so we can get a new one (this really is a shame; we just bought this Britax Marathon a few weeks ago). The officer mentioned since it is a Britax it most likely is fine but we should still probably replace it. I agree.
I contacted my insurance and they presented 2 options:
-Option A-
Place a claim with them, pay the $500 deductible. They will then pursue the other at fault insurance company to make a claim. My insurance can't guarantee they will pay up, however this option is the fastest way to get reimbursed if they do. I am also not guaranteed that my rates won't go up even though I wasn't at fault.
-Option B-
Place a claim with the at fault insurance company, and let them investigate. It will take longer, but if they accept liability they will cover 100%.
My insurance rep seemed to recommend option B, if he personally were in this situation, so that is what I intend to do. I just called the other driver's insurance company and they said they will be sending out an adjuster tomorrow to take a look at the car. I told her I am only interested in replacing the car seat, and she said well then he will look at the carseat.
I asked her how their reimbursement policy worked for this because you can't tell just by looking at the carseat whether there is damage, there could be internal damage to the infrastructure that is not visibly apparent on the outside. She said something to the extent of she hadn't heard of that and that I'll need to ask the adjuster.
So my question is, when the adjuster from this other insurance company comes out tomorrow, if after inspecting the car seat he doesn't see a reason to reimburse me for it, is there any information I can present him with to prove that safety experts say that car seats involved in any accident should get replaced? Is there any kind of documentation for that? Does anyone know if Maryland has a law requiring reimbursement?
I'm just worried he/she will say since there isn't any damage to the car itself then reimbursing for the car seat isn't warranted. I do not think I should have to pay over $270 for another car seat to replace this one since it was not my fault. Any advice is welcome!
Laura
The bottom edge of my license plate was bent a little, and there are a few minor scratched when inspected closely, but no major damage. We do not intend on having any repairs made to the car, we just want reimbursement for the car seat so we can get a new one (this really is a shame; we just bought this Britax Marathon a few weeks ago). The officer mentioned since it is a Britax it most likely is fine but we should still probably replace it. I agree.
I contacted my insurance and they presented 2 options:
-Option A-
Place a claim with them, pay the $500 deductible. They will then pursue the other at fault insurance company to make a claim. My insurance can't guarantee they will pay up, however this option is the fastest way to get reimbursed if they do. I am also not guaranteed that my rates won't go up even though I wasn't at fault.
-Option B-
Place a claim with the at fault insurance company, and let them investigate. It will take longer, but if they accept liability they will cover 100%.
My insurance rep seemed to recommend option B, if he personally were in this situation, so that is what I intend to do. I just called the other driver's insurance company and they said they will be sending out an adjuster tomorrow to take a look at the car. I told her I am only interested in replacing the car seat, and she said well then he will look at the carseat.
I asked her how their reimbursement policy worked for this because you can't tell just by looking at the carseat whether there is damage, there could be internal damage to the infrastructure that is not visibly apparent on the outside. She said something to the extent of she hadn't heard of that and that I'll need to ask the adjuster.

So my question is, when the adjuster from this other insurance company comes out tomorrow, if after inspecting the car seat he doesn't see a reason to reimburse me for it, is there any information I can present him with to prove that safety experts say that car seats involved in any accident should get replaced? Is there any kind of documentation for that? Does anyone know if Maryland has a law requiring reimbursement?
I'm just worried he/she will say since there isn't any damage to the car itself then reimbursing for the car seat isn't warranted. I do not think I should have to pay over $270 for another car seat to replace this one since it was not my fault. Any advice is welcome!
Laura