SSR-CM said:Actually, it is 72,000.
GoofyDad869 said:Interesting point. I also wonder how the Fire Marshall determines the maximum occupancy? Technically (in my interpretation), when you are at Magic Kingdom you are on the rooftop of a building (Utilidors underneath). That would limit the number considerably versus calculating the number of people allowed per occupiable acre.
WillCAD said:It's not really the rooftop of a building. MK is built up above the previous grade (I think it's 14 feet?), but the whole thing isn't one giant basement; it's basically a man-made hill, with the Utilidor system built into it. Except in areas where you are actually on top of a Utilidor, most of MK is built on dirt that was trucked in to build up the grade, so I don't think that is a factor in determining ocupancy.
My guess is that the total occupancy of all the buildings and line queues might have something to do with it, or it might be a simple matter of the acreage of the park, or some combination of the two.
The whole build-up thing is fascinating, though. It's like a land version of how they built whole new islands for the airports in Hong Kong, Kobe, and Osaka, except they didn't build MK out to sea!
Wrong, taxes are paid on general revenue not a body count.May i cheekily suggest that attendance figures are closely guarded secrets for Tax reasons?? eg fewer people reported as being there means lower reported income to the IRS means less tax paid.
I think they increase attendance by opening new shows, attractions, and things like Mardi Gras not by knowing how many people are there.Attendnace figures are probably guarded to prevent compeditors from planning strategies to get Guests away from Disney.
Dznefreek said:Wrong, taxes are paid on general revenue not a body count.
civileng68 said:Right. And correct me if Im wrong, because Im not 100% sure here but, Disney is located 1/2 on Orange Co. and 1/2 on Osceola Co. and Disney purposely does not use most of the land on Orange Co. so as not to pay taxes to Orange Co. since Orange Co. would not give them a tax break. Disney asked Orange Co. for a big tax break if Disney built and maintained it's own roads on that side and never requested any funding for them from the Co. Orange refused, obviously wanting disney tax money.
However, Osceola Co. agreed to the deal and Disney is basically, legally and rightfully per their agreement with Osceola Co. getting away incredibly cheap on taxes.
.
Dznefreek said:I think they increase attendance by opening new shows, attractions, and things like Mardi Gras not by knowing how many people are there.
jgmklmhem said:Just to give reference: (stats are based off of numbers reported for the year 2005 in Amusement business)
Average daily attendence:
WDW
MK 44,100
EPCOT 27,100
MGM 23,500
DAK 22,400
DLR
DL 39,700
DCA 15,900
Others:
Sea World Orlando 15,300
Universal Orlando 16,700
Islands of Adventure 15,800
civileng68 said:While obviously due to the number of parks and size of the property, it is still amazing to see these numbers and now sort of get an idea for how much MORE money WDW is bringing in, as opposed to DL (just on tickets alone, let alone imagining other sales). Wow!
Dznefreek said:Quote:
May i cheekily suggest that attendance figures are closely guarded secrets for Tax reasons?? eg fewer people reported as being there means lower reported income to the IRS means less tax paid.
Wrong, taxes are paid on general revenue not a body count.
ujpest_doza said:It was a joke, but the body count should give eagle eyed tax inspectors a good idea of revenue streams.
By not disclosing body counts or hotel capacity used an unscrupulous financial controller can in theory manipulate reported profits and revenues in order to pay less corporation tax.
I know it isn't really feasible as we are talking about a company listed on Wall Street as opposed to a small private company and also because cash transactions, particularly for park tickets and hotel stays, are very rare.
I know it was tongue and cheek, but actually, since there are AP holders, and multi-day passes that significantly change the "per body" revenue vs the single day ticket purchaser, any auditor wouldn't know where to start to confirm through attendance what ticket booth revenues were unless Disney were to provide them with ticket type statistics scanned each day at the gate which once again relies on corporate governance. Plus, most of the time in the public capital sector, you see fudging to improve revenues and earnings, not to hide and minimize taxes unless some CFO's compensation package was designed around reducing tax exposure.ujpest_doza said:It was a joke, but the body count should give eagle eyed tax inspectors a good idea of revenue streams.
By not disclosing body counts or hotel capacity used an unscrupulous financial controller can in theory manipulate reported profits and revenues in order to pay less corporation tax.
I know it isn't really feasible as we are talking about a company listed on Wall Street as opposed to a small private company and also because cash transactions, particularly for park tickets and hotel stays, are very rare.