deekaypee
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2006
- Messages
- 3,538
How about an alternative? It's fairly common for words to lose their hyphenation when they become more common. For instance email and online were once e-mail and on-line. Wall paper was once wall-paper, goodbye was once good-bye, and breakfast once break-fast.
Rather than dropping such descriptors--whether identification tags associated with points-of-origin, heritage, ancestry or nationality--why not have these words become single, compound words?
Of course, this thread is less about the English language than about how one identifies oneself in terms of national and global citizenship. For those who aren't aware of it, the whole debate of hyphenated Americans has a long, sometimes contentious history. (A summary is available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyphenated_American. I, for one, follow the practice of not hyphenating: African American rather than African-American, which I believe gives equal weight to African and American rather than subordinates the African to the American. Such an interpretation about the meaning of the hyphen is open to debates, of course, and such debates are useful for us to engage in thoughtfully as citizens and public intellectuals. I will note, though, the support for a melting-pot idea--which is related to the belief in the need for a singular, nationalist identity and is related to the emergence of an American Adam--takes on a great deal of connotative significance when talking about people who might also be characterized using descriptors such as first generation, immigrant, and members of non-dominant culture.
Rather than dropping such descriptors--whether identification tags associated with points-of-origin, heritage, ancestry or nationality--why not have these words become single, compound words?
Of course, this thread is less about the English language than about how one identifies oneself in terms of national and global citizenship. For those who aren't aware of it, the whole debate of hyphenated Americans has a long, sometimes contentious history. (A summary is available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyphenated_American. I, for one, follow the practice of not hyphenating: African American rather than African-American, which I believe gives equal weight to African and American rather than subordinates the African to the American. Such an interpretation about the meaning of the hyphen is open to debates, of course, and such debates are useful for us to engage in thoughtfully as citizens and public intellectuals. I will note, though, the support for a melting-pot idea--which is related to the belief in the need for a singular, nationalist identity and is related to the emergence of an American Adam--takes on a great deal of connotative significance when talking about people who might also be characterized using descriptors such as first generation, immigrant, and members of non-dominant culture.



