My first post! 
I'm planning the first disney trip for my family, and I haven't been myself since I was 7 years old and "Disney World" was only the Magic Kingdom with Epcot still under construction. So it is all very new to me.
We will be there late January/early February for 7 nights, planning on 6 days in the parks, family of 4 and kids will be almost 5 yrs old and 7 yrs old. I'm very torn between saving some money and staying at POR versus paying the extra for Wilderness Lodge. On one hand, I love the theme of Wilderness Lodge, I love the convenience to Magic Kingdom, which is where I anticipate spending the majority of our time, and I like the fact that it is an enclosed resort, particularly for the time of year when we will be traveling with the possibility of chilly weather.
But on the flip side, I just don't know that those "pros" of WL are worth the extra money when we really don't expect to spend much time at the resort except for sleeping. The kids don't nap anymore but do go to bed early, so I expect that for the most part, we'll get up and hit the parks, have early ADRs for dinner, and then head back to our room to put the kids to bed. Part of me says it is just not worth the extra money. The other part of me says this likely to be a once in a lifetime trip for our family, so we should spend the money for the resort that feels like it is better for us.
Any thoughts that might help me make up my mind?
(I've pretty well narrowed down to these two, but if someone thinks I should seriously consider another alternative, let me know! If we go with WL, I anticipate getting a standard room. That's about the top of our budget - i don't think we'd upgrade to a more expensive room or to one of the other deluxe resorts. If we go with POR, I'll probably spring for the one of the royal themed rooms.)

I'm planning the first disney trip for my family, and I haven't been myself since I was 7 years old and "Disney World" was only the Magic Kingdom with Epcot still under construction. So it is all very new to me.
We will be there late January/early February for 7 nights, planning on 6 days in the parks, family of 4 and kids will be almost 5 yrs old and 7 yrs old. I'm very torn between saving some money and staying at POR versus paying the extra for Wilderness Lodge. On one hand, I love the theme of Wilderness Lodge, I love the convenience to Magic Kingdom, which is where I anticipate spending the majority of our time, and I like the fact that it is an enclosed resort, particularly for the time of year when we will be traveling with the possibility of chilly weather.
But on the flip side, I just don't know that those "pros" of WL are worth the extra money when we really don't expect to spend much time at the resort except for sleeping. The kids don't nap anymore but do go to bed early, so I expect that for the most part, we'll get up and hit the parks, have early ADRs for dinner, and then head back to our room to put the kids to bed. Part of me says it is just not worth the extra money. The other part of me says this likely to be a once in a lifetime trip for our family, so we should spend the money for the resort that feels like it is better for us.
Any thoughts that might help me make up my mind?

(I've pretty well narrowed down to these two, but if someone thinks I should seriously consider another alternative, let me know! If we go with WL, I anticipate getting a standard room. That's about the top of our budget - i don't think we'd upgrade to a more expensive room or to one of the other deluxe resorts. If we go with POR, I'll probably spring for the one of the royal themed rooms.)