senecabeach said:
Abuse by adults??
Buy a ticket, use a ticket, who cares who uses it?
Disney does, and always has. Tickets have always been sold as "non-transferrable", regardless of what people have actually done with them. With the new pricing scheme slanted toward buying more days and permanently locking the pass into one user, I think some of the immediate goals are pretty evident:
1. People buy more days than they really need due to the slanted pricing at the 7 and 10 day purchase options. This could have one of two effects:
a) People plan return trips sooner than they had previously anticipated, or
b) People give Disney their money up-front and then either stick the pass in a drawer indefinitely or never end up using it at all.
2. Rather than two people sharing a 7-day pass, you have two people buying their own passes. Since prices become more economical as you buy more days, Disney has either sold two short-duration tickets with higher profit margins, or two longer duration passes, which relate back to #1 above.
As I said in this thread or another, it's clear that Disney has quite a bit of money to make by helping to restrict activities that violate the "non-transferrability" clauses that have always existed. As a frequent visitor,
DVC owner and shareholder, I'd much rather see them increase the bottom line via these new pass restrictions rather than another across-the-board price increase.
Im sure if D got a cut from E-bay, et al..this wouldn't be happening.
Yeah, but they can't, so it's irrelevant. Besides, tickets have always been sold as one pass, one user. I don't know why it's so hard to swallow that they are simply taking steps to ensure that people cannot use tickets otherwise.
BTW...guess I should be happy that DVC dues will increase too??
Huh?
someone please...savedisney.com
You're kidding, right? I'm certainly not a member of the Michael Eisner fan club, but Savedisney.com lost its relevance about 9 months ago. Does the movement even still exist? Last time I checked, Roy and Stan basically issued a mea culpa and backed the board's plan subsequent to Eisner's resignation.
And, at risk of beating a dead horse, I still don't see how anything Disney is doing with regard to tickets will HURT the company. Last time I checked, protecting the use of your product and thereby increasing revenues is supposed to be a GOOD thing.