I do understand that the language was quite confronting, and it’s not how I would have phrased it. I think that (the bolded) is the crux for me. I can’t imagine my husband ever saying no to something that I wanted to do with my life, because he knows what’s important to me. So I guess, if I really wanted to do something in my career (eg the aforementioned Masters degree) and he said “no”, I probably would have the same attitude as the OP that it’s not his career and he doesn’t get a say. However, I honestly cannot imagine it coming to that, and if we did have a situation like that, it would be such a shift in our relationship that it would be a symptom of a much bigger problem (again, stressing the fact that I’m only talking about my relationship, not anyone else’s).
When I got married 18 years ago, I was on a wedding forum and the discussion of “obey” was raised frequently. I was one who would never have “obeyed” (though obeying is not a part of the vows in the Church of Scotland, so I didn’t have an option). However, I remember someone saying that she was happy to vow to obey, because she trusted her then-fiancé to only ever ask her to do something that was in their shared interest. I think that can be a risky mentality as it leaves you open to abuse, but there is an analogy to this discussion: to me, in a healthy, functioning relationship, neither party to going to make a major life decision or act in a waythat is in opposition to the shared goals and values. So the logistics of whether you discuss the specifics beforehand, only shop together, or just have certain unwritten boundaries that you don’t cross, are all up to the couple in question.
There is a level of trust involved though, and while I understand that one should never enter into a marraige without that trust, I also believe that it needs to build as the years pass. For instance, when DH and I married, I knew I trusted him, however even though we had spent years together prior to our marraige, we were still growing, and needed to continue to learn to grow individually as our children left our nest. For us, that meant dealing with the changes I was facing moreso than him, but he was learning to adjust to my needs and wants. As much as I knew he woudl support me in any decision I made, I could never have removed him from the discussion, because he was the other half of my whole heart.
As he approached a turning point in his life, Retirement, he was faced with several financial decisions regarding how he planned to take his pension. Oh the "guys" had plenty of advice, most of which was appalling to the accountant in me, but I listened. We went to several meetings with the pension specialist, and I had decided what to choose, but he was still leaning towards the "guys" advice. At that point I felt we were at a crossroad, and decided that rather than try to convince this man that I was right, I could trust my huband to make a decision that was not just in his best interest, but one that considered me in the unspeakable event that something happened to him. I knew that I would need to sign off on whatever decsion that was made, but I never said that out loud. You see, I knew that no matter what DH said, he was never going to do anything that had any potential harm to me, and he did not. In the fist few years of our marraige, we were still building that foundation of trust, and I think I would bhave been more verbal. Rather than just laying out the financials, and then trusting, I would have have plenty of words tossed in there as well.
DH and I discuss any big purchases. Not that either of us would ever tell the other one "no" to something they really wanted, but we do talk about it to maybe say "wait one more payday before you buy it" or whatever.
My Father in Law is a different story - he is the BOSS of that household. Right when DH and I first started dating before I really knew his parents that well, he told me that his mom's car had been making a noise and so his dad took it to the shop while she was at work - the mechanic told them it was going to be an expensive fix so he went and bought her a different car - she got no say whatsoever in this. I was just flabbergasted - I didn't realize that there were couples still out there that were that "old school" that the husband made all the decisions. Since then I found out that he did the same thing when he bought their house. They had their farm under contract and one day while my MIL was at work, FIL met with a realtor and bought a new house in town!!!!
I work with a few of those women. I am 62 and would never be in that situation, let alone stay in it. One is a young mother who had accepted a job, but had to then renege because she did not ask her husband. He told her to quit, and next time she was to discuss it with him. They have two daughters, and I am shocked that they are teaching their girls that all decisions go through the male in teh household.
The other is just a mess. Her DH has removed her voice from any decisons within the home, and she has stopped complaining to us because at some point there is just no kind way to say " I just do not know what to say" to this woman. She does not participate in any decisionmakeing, from meal planning to major purchases, she is just the end user. SHe says he is "old school" but as a woman who is married to the man whose entire life would be complete if his wife was June Cleaver in jeans and sneakers, and a macaroni necklace one of the girls made, she gets no pass from me.
This old school thing is not a thing. It is the excuse bully's use to get their way.