I love Harry Potter, and can't imagine how anyone is harmed by these delightful books.
Still, I'm not sure I agree with those who say such protests are "censorship". By ranting, raving, burning/cutting books, whatever....people are expressing themselves in a way that doesn't prevent the Harry Potter books from being written, published, or read. I can't see where these protest actions have any tangible effect on my ability to read the books if I so choose, so I don't *feel* that censorship is occuring with this specific example.
Of course, I disagree with the protesters and think it's all a bit silly. Still, they are simply exercising their own rights to say they don't like the books and in so doing don't seem to be denying me the opportunity to read them if I choose.
Naturally, if anyone was intimidated or prevented from accessing the books and movies in some material way, that would then cross the line and be censorship.
Just my 3 cents' worth (inflation, y'know!)....good discussion!