suejai
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2009
- Messages
- 1,456
I see your point, but I disagree.
Ideally the child would learn to save while he's still, well . . . a child.
But if the adult child hasn't learned it, then the parent is right to help him along that path. Many people who reach adulthood without budgeting skills don't tend to pick them up until they reach a crisis -- it's kinder to help the child learn before he's about to lose his car, before his credit card is maxed out, and before he reaches crisis mode.
Many people don't save because they figure $50/week -- or whatever amount -- isn't much of anything, and there's no point in bothering. BUT if someone "forces" them to save for a couple months, and they suddenly see that they've saved more than $1000, and it was painless, THAT can be a turn-around moment. A moment that can encourage the adult child to begin saving on his own.
And what's the alternative to "forced saving"? Doing nothing and hoping that the adult child will figure it out? Nagging?
I think that you may have missed disykat's point. She is not arguing against making them save but rather against the idea of charging rent and the parent doing the saving and presenting that back to the child. The child at that point has learned nothing.
I think they should learn that they have to pay room and board and save as well. It is something neither DH nor I learned as children and are only just now coming to grips with; I can budget with the best of them when there is nothing, but when there is plenty I get into trouble. So unfortunately we never taught proper money management to our kids when they were younger. So we are all going to learn together
