It's time that Disney drops Mickey as their corporate symbol and change to something that the fans can better relate to, I think.
![]()
yoda lookin a little crosseyed yikkkkkeeeesss

It's time that Disney drops Mickey as their corporate symbol and change to something that the fans can better relate to, I think.
![]()
I agree that it is time for a change, but let's face it, every time Disney makes a change, well it just doesn't work out.
We don't know if this will be a 3D simulator yet. We only know it will be Mickey Mouse themed and be trackless.
That's true but the building is huge to just be a simulator like Star Wars.We don't "know" that either. It's just a rumor until formally announced.
Universal Creative to park operations when they ask if they got anything new developed![]()
"You get a simulator! And you get a simulator!"
That's a hilarious generalization that isn't even remotely true. I could list 20-30 changes Disney made that are excellent. You are correct that not every change will be for the better - but many are improvements. (Replacing "Food Rocks" with "Soarin?", the upgrade to Haunted Mansion a few years back, Buzz Lightyear replacing If You Had Wings/Dreamflight, I would argue the Three Calebelleros ride in Mexico is an improvement.)
There have been improvements though. The ones he listed were good examples of it actually, though I will admit Dreamflight was interesting but with people on another thread arguing on whether or not Wreck-It Ralph would fit in Tommorowland while Dreamflight was definitely out of place!Sounds like that you just like to argue. Have fun with yourself.
Sounds like that you just like to argue. Have fun with yourself.
Sounds more like he makes a great point that your generalized comment doesn't hold up against the facts.
Ehh..most would sayWe enjoy the screens and simulator rides. I suspect most people do as they are extremely popular and they keep building them.
In some cases yes but in others a screen can cost as much as a set.I'm sure people do enjoy them, though I imagine cost effectiveness plays more into their prevalence than guest satisfaction.
Yes because 4% is SOO much and there aren't any other reasons but constructionis it any wonder attendance has dipped?
I'm sure people do enjoy them, though I imagine cost effectiveness plays more into their prevalence than guest satisfaction.
Sounds like that you just like to argue. Have fun with yourself.
This makes complete sense with how Martin has been saying the e ticket coming would be controversial. Ripping out GMR a DHS opening day attraction is huge. That means Indiana jones is the last opening day attraction in DHS...
Interesting note, several of the sources including Martin and Spirit from WDWmagic like the attraction and the IP that will be used for the new ride but just don't like the placement. They think this would've been better in its own space rather than in GMR.
You believe what you want to and I'll believe what I want to. Martin has a proven track record.Don't listen to anything Martin says! He's a liar, a phony and a fraud!