I absolutely agree with this! unfortunately in my district, those are the funds that seem to be cut first. The lower kids are well funded and helped along, as they should be, but the advanced kids are neglected and that isn't right. Its very disheartening.
Same here and it ticks me off.
I'm not sure that's true everywhere. It wasn't true when I was in school, but that was a million years ago so it may have changed. In fact, the G&T program was lost to budget cuts as the school system was legally required to provide services and extra staff for SpEd students, but not the G&T program. G&T kids were not put in the same category as Special Needs students in our district.
Again, this was 20 years ago, so things may have changed (although from the posts by others in Mass. I'm guessing it hasn't)
GT programs in general are often the victims of the budget axe.
When I was in school - early 70's thru mid 80's in California the state had what was called the MGM Program. MGM stood for Mentally Gifted Minors. I was in that program from first grade to high school. I have no idea how I ended up there, I really don't. I don't remember testing or anything else but even when we moved 30 miles away when I was in 2nd grade I was right back in that program.
The MGM program was not "academic" we didn't write papers or read advanced novels or learn advanced math, we were exposed to many more things than the other students. We met 2 days a week in the school library during normal school hours. In elementary school I remember learning the Metric System, going to see plays at the local childrens theater, multiple field trips to science labs etc. We made movies, developed ad campaigns, met with people from all over the world via the University system etc. It was an amazing program and I got a lot out of it, some of my fondest school memories revolve around the MGM program.
I also went to school during the years where kids were grouped by their abilities and I am a huge fan of putting kids with their academic peers. Let the brite ones excel to the best of their capabilities, let the average be average and help them to get there, let the low learn a skill. We can't treat them all the same, they are not all the same. We also need more places for the PROFOUNDLY gifted kids. The Little Man Tates of the world, not the bright or even the average GT kid, I'm talking the 16 year old who attends the Davidson Academy
http://www.davidsonacademy.unr.edu/and studies nuclear physics type gifted. Those are the kids that really suffer socially.
I don't care if its not politically correct, the current system is not working, we are dumbing down our kids and no one is winning.
My DS and DD both "tested" into Nevada's GT program. DS went once. They bussed the kids to a common location for an afterschool program that was geared around writing. DS decided that was not for him. DD, we didn't even bother, we pulled her out of the local crappy elementary school and put her into a High Achieving Charter School - she is leaps and bounds ahead of the neighbor kids and more importantly she is thriving, loves school and is being challenged.
To answer the question in my own way -
Often GT kids do not do well in a normal classroom and have high drop out rates due to boredom. I have never heard of a GT program that was in place purely because of the at risk factor.