Gumbo4x4
Note to the ladies who forgot to
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2012
- Messages
- 25,659
This is where the whole regional thing comes into play. Around here, no one would rather pay for drinks than not have access to them - no one has a cash bar, it would be seen as incredibly cheap and tacky. No one's Grammy or Uncle George is going to want to pay for drinks. You are inviting people to a party as your guests, you can't expect them to pay for themselves. Again, this is a REGIONAL thing; I know in lots of other areas it is different.
Nobody's forcing them to buy anything. They are getting free food & drink, it just may or may not be what they want. If they want something else to eat, they can stop at their favorite restaurant on the way to the reception. If they want a drink that's not on the "free" menu, they can pay for it or go without.
I don't like iced tea, but I've been to MANY functions where the drink choice was iced tea or water. I'd have much rather been able to reach into my pocket & pull out a buck or two for a soda than to have to gag down iced tea or tapwater.
PS - I have been to lots of wedding where only wine, beer, and basic liquor is served. The last wedding I went to was a late afternoon with hors d'oerves and cake, punch (alcoholic and non-alchoholic) and champagne - oh, and soft drinks and juice. It was a younger couple and it was all they could afford and it was absolutely lovely!
Nothing wrong with that. But, I don't see why that is considered lovely, and yet the identical menu PLUS the option to pay for an upgrade (for a cost) is not. I guess guests carrrying around a flask is the norm if there's no liquor provided?
