Freedom to Marry Day Protest Planned

Leave it up the left to again take something simple and positive and pollute it with their selfish political agenda. First it was hijacking the word "gay" (which actually used to be a nice adjective that meant "carefree and happy") and now it's Valentine's Day. :rolleyes:

Ok, we give "gay" back -- we'll go by "those justly damned to eternal hellfire" from now on. happy?

And let's get a law through Congress quickly that makes it clear that Valentines Day is restricted for the enjoyment of bigots, facists, and people who think they, above everyone else knows God's plan.

I'll start the letter writing campaign today.
 
Shhh!!! Just be sure you dont talk about same sex marriage in the public schools

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/..._klux_klan&ns=JaySekulow&dt=02/05/2007&page=1


Late last year, Justin and three other students presented their public speaking topic regarding the issue of same-sex marriage. This topic was approved ahead of time by Justin’s teachers. In preparing for and delivering their speeches, Justin and the other members of his group followed and fulfilled each and every guideline provided by their instructors. Justin initially selected the topic in question and served as the moderator for the group. As moderator, Justin introduced the topic and gave a brief summary of the points each member of the speech group was to deliver. Justin presented closing remarks as well.

The students covered the following areas in making their presentation:

1) Religious opposition to same-sex marriage;
2) Political opposition to same-sex marriage; and
3) Scientific evidence as it relates to same-sex marriage.


Despite their hard work, each member of the group received a failing grade for their assignment. Other than brief notes sketched out by the teachers on evaluation forms, Justin was not presented with any details or reasons as to why he and the other members of his group received an “F” for their presentation. The day after the presentation, Justin met with one of his teachers regarding an assignment unrelated to the same-sex marriage issue; however, the teacher brought up the previous presentation on the same-sex marriage issue and told Justin that he “reminded” him “of the Ku Klux Klan.” This comment was made in the presence of other students in the classroom. Later that same day, during the Law and Public Speaking class, the teacher stated, in front of the students present for class, that the presentation of Justin’s group was “offensive” and made reference, once again, to the Ku Klux Klan — to which the other public speaking teacher publicly commented, “pointed hats and long-flowing robes.”
 
Leave it up the left to again take something simple and positive and pollute it with their selfish political agenda. First it was hijacking the word "gay" (which actually used to be a nice adjective that meant "carefree and happy") and now it's Valentine's Day. :rolleyes:

The above post is henceforth going to be filed in my "Good Lord I hope this was intended as sarcasm" cabinet. :rotfl:
 
There are so many countries already accepting same sex marriages or civil unions and in none of those countries anything changed to the worse for straight people - it just got better for the gay and lesbian people and I don't see anything wrong with that.
IMHO JoeEpcotRocks sounds like an Iranian fundamentalist :rolleyes:
Joe, I hope that one of your kids turns out to be homosexual - perhaps this would be an eye-opener for you :rolleyes1

Why do you wish that my children make destructive choices??
 

If you want to live in a place where the government is controlled by one religion, you are in the wrong place.

Is that what you want? Our country to be run like those you have called the enemy?

Our govenment is controlled by voters (either directly or usually through representatives) who have equal say -- whether their their voting choices are God-based or not.
 
Actuallu there is quite a difference between what others posted and the way you read it.

I believe what people, including me, were posting is that the church marriages should no longer be legally binding. That each persion should have to get a civil union, and those that wanted to, could supplement that with a religious ceremony.

The key point being that in the future it would be the civil unions that were legally recognized, not the relgious ceremony.

I think this is a semantic argument, that the church wedding is not legally binding is essentially the same as I was saying that they are prohibited from carrying them out. Their services would be 'blessings' not including a legal element. My substantive argument is that if you want a change accepted then don't change what you don't have to. Surely the positive impact of a gay religious wedding would be advantageous rather than the possible negative reaction to making all those princesses give up their dreams of a church wedding.
 
You can't make this stuff up.

Joe, you're in a hole. Stop digging.

I meant exactly what I said.

Lifestyle choices made that our contrary to God's Word are self-inflicted wounds. However, thru God's love, grace and strength anyone can overcome bad choices.
 
Ok, we give "gay" back

One could , but substituting "homosexual" probably wouldn't fly. I guess another approach is to let the right hijack some other postive sounding adjective to describe the "majority" sexual orientation.

But then again, those holding that have never felt the need.;)

Butr back to my main point. If the left wants to polute/hijack Valentine's Day, then I propose that the right should give them a taste of their own medicine. The annual Stonewall Day celebration held by "gays" in the east should now be co-opted by the United Daughters Of The Confederacy as a celebration of the legacy of a beloved Southern Civil War General.:thumbsup2
 
Leave it up the left to again take something simple and positive and pollute it with their selfish political agenda. First it was hijacking the word "gay" (which actually used to be a nice adjective that meant "carefree and happy") and now it's Valentine's Day. :rolleyes:

Whare did the Valentines Day bit come in?

And if we are talking original use of words nice originally meant accurate!
 
I'm working it on it. Do not rush me Aunt Bea or you'll be sorry what I dig up.

andydenver.gif
 
I meant exactly what I said.

Lifestyle choices made that our contrary to God's Word are self-inflicted wounds. However, thru God's love, grace and strength anyone can overcome bad choices.


And I continue to pray that people choose to live their lives in a loving manner and not one full of hate mongering.
 
Segregating public accomodation by race was struck down by judicial fiat as voting couldn't get it doen--I suppose you don't approve.

Let's dust off all those "White's Only" signs--darned activist judges...

Two completely separate issues.

The fight for racial equality and society-blessed homosexual lifestyles are independent.

I'm sure the polygamist will be re-newing their efforts soon.
 
One could , but substituting "homosexual" probably wouldn't fly. I guess another approach is to let the right hijack some other postive sounding adjective to describe the "majority" sexual orientation.

But then again, those holding that have never felt the need.;)

Butr back to my main point. If the left wants to polute/hijack Valentine's Day, then I propose that the right should give them a taste of their own medicine. The annual Stonewall Day celebration held by "gays" in the east should now be co-opted by the United Daughters Of The Confederacy as a celebration of the legacy of a beloved Southern Civil War General.:thumbsup2

There are other words that some homophobic closed minded folks have co-opted and now use in a manner that was not it's original intent. One that comes to mind used to reference a bundle of sticks.
 
Two completely separate issues.

The fight for racial equality and society-blessed homosexual lifestyles are independent.

I'm sure the polygamist will be re-newing their efforts soon.

Don't forget beastiality and pedophilia, necrophilia and the like. You used to always equate a loving consensual committed relationship between gay adults with that as well. You might as well continue.
 
Two completely separate issues.

The fight for racial equality and society-blessed homosexual lifestyles are independent.

I'm sure the polygamist will be re-newing their efforts soon.

I'm game, what makes them different?
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter
Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom