I think that we need to take a step back; both to get some perspective and to reduce the bile in our posts.I could almost buy UNCFanatik's theory that people who didn't know about late FPs were at a disadvantage.
But to now argue that the ability to use 5, 6, or 7 FPs per day in the current system is ALSO a knowledge advantage is completely asinine. The time to get your next FP is PRINTED ON THE FP ITSELF. It's not like we had a super-secret club where we knew the super-secret rules about when you're allowed to pull FPs.
The new system doesn't level the playing field, it just limits the number of runs you can score. The planners (or UNCFanatik's so-called superusers) will still get the best FP+ reservations at the best times, their effort would still be rewarded. So what happens to those "poor people" who don't like to wake up early when the only Space Mountain FP+ times available are between 9 and 10 a.m. Does Disney again have to level the playing field when that happens?
In my opinion, it is wrong to think of this as 'leveling the playing field' in a wealth distribution kind of way. TPTB have reason to take action to equalize the number of FPs that are received not to make things 'fair', but to maximize the number of people who are happy. If by restricting my number of short line rides on TSMM to two they can keep me reasonably happy and make three more people happy, where's the downside? Even if I got peaved by my reduction in TSMM rides, it is still a win for the company.
This is a business decision by the company which results in more happy customers than it peaves. That's a win.