Update:
The first guests who "qualify" have been flagged in the reservations system. The intent is to make the offer at check-in. Due to various "reasons" (people making mistakes primarily) the early flagged guests are arriving today but the resorts don't have their stock of bands yet.
To clarify, it's not meant to be all guests at a particular resort, though the resort(s) chosen are a limiting factor of eligibility. They're looking for certain criteria and also applying a bit of random assignment.
It's the same as an overbook and upgrade setup in Disney's hotel system. Guests who meet the criteria (dates, room type, etc..) are "flagged" and will be offered the upgrade - or in this case Magic Band - as they arrive. It's like a sort of random lottery. there's only a certain number of spots, like how there's only a certain number of upgrades when they do it for rooms, and people can refuse (and people do refuse room upgrades for various reasons) but once they reach the limit that has been set the other guests who are "flagged" wont even know about it.
After keeping up with the almost 2000 posts on this thread and worrying about how my june trip will go, i just watched Celebrate the magic on youtube, had tears in my eyes, and realized that whatever they do to fastpasses I will always go back. No one does the magic like Disney....
I've read through quite a bit of this tonight and virtually every scenario involves spending more money. If this works it's brilliant on Disney's part. Annoying but brilliant.![]()
Sorry havnt read the last 10 pages..
Just checking to see if anyone has heard a date for when FP+ is up?
Or if anyone has entered virtual tickets yet?
I have yet to feel the brilliance, or see the high revenue return opportunity. I get the marketing ideas, but data collection, changing flow and offering alternative experiences does not equate to revenue. It might. But it is not obvious that it will.
My supermarket has the scanner devices so you can shop and bag while you go, and then just swipe once at checkout. It is tagged to my supermarket account. The scanner tries to get you to buy more things, sends alerts, gives coupons while you are on site. The system also knows what I buy, and I get coupons and offers in the mail. The convenience (and technology which has been excellent, unlike the DW website) is great. But I am not spending more. I like it for the service and speed aspect, and that keeps me loyal to that store..but if it was glitchy, it would probably turn me off to their store completely.
Disney has a history of weak and glitchy tech. Amazing with their resources, but it is fairly obvious. On the other hand they have no real competition for what they can offer. Part of why they can have bad tech, and you still go back. The convenience add ons are nice (I enjoyed the RFID room card last trip a ton!! So nice to just wave it, particularly with things in your hands) but it is not "wow me" technology. It is not why I will go back to DW. And when all of this glitches, I will still go back.
I've read through quite a bit of this tonight and virtually every scenario involves spending more money. If this works it's brilliant on Disney's part. Annoying but brilliant.![]()
ryalluvdiz said:After keeping up with the almost 2000 posts on this thread and worrying about how my june trip will go, i just watched Celebrate the magic on youtube, had tears in my eyes, and realized that whatever they do to fastpasses I will always go back. No one does the magic like Disney....
Planogirl said:I've read through quite a bit of this tonight and virtually every scenario involves spending more money. If this works it's brilliant on Disney's part. Annoying but brilliant.![]()
Robo said:But, they have managed to stir up a portion of their base customers, and mostly not in a good way.
bigAWL said:Disney has a pretty long track record of maintaining a pretty large market share of the theme park vacationers around the world. I don't think they've done this by building the most rides, or the most advanced rides, and certainly not by simply raising ticket prices. It seems to me they've done it by creating an immersive vacation experience unmatched by anyone else... along with a healthy dose of marketing. Not everything Disney has done has been a huge success. This may or may not recoup them all their investment. I don't think it's going to lose them much of their market share.
Edit: and I think Disney execs must see some pretty big opportunity with this, or they wouldn't be doing it.
I don't think you can judge from DISboards that their "base customers" have been stirred up "mostly not in a good way" -- not a big enough portion of them, anyway.
As with feedback to a company, those with negative things to say are more likely to post. And trust me: I know plenty of Disney loyalists who don't even set foot on DIS because of the negativity often found.
DIS is a small part of Disney's "base", and I'd guess many who like it (SO FAR) on here are keeping quiet rather than get pounced on and accused of being a Disney plant whose bonus depends on touting FP+ on here!! Lol!!![]()
doconeill said:He said "portion of their base customers", not all of them. So in that he is accurate. And it's not just on the DIS...I know other groups not too happy at this point about the changes.
Yes. And my point is that this "portion" likely represents a very small number of whatever we're calling a "base customer" -- and a really small number of their overall audience.
And the other boards are largely the same -- it's more than just online -- those with negative things to say are more likely to voice opinions. Especially when those who oppose get accused of ridiculous things like I was.
Just saying you really cannot draw ANY conclusions from the tiny, heavily skewed sample on DIS or any other board. And to extrapolate that this is enough to possibly hurt Disney's bottom line, not enough evidence/data for that by a long shot -- not yet, anyway.
I feel the need to quote DH: "We never leave WDW thinking: 'WOW! THAT WAS CHEAP!', but we ALWAYS leave thinking: 'it was worth every penny'.
At least, that's us.![]()
the same can be said about every decision the company has ever made. Every change will make some small part of the customer base to be unhappy. This one seems to be designed to make more people more happy than it makes less happy. That's a win.Robo said:But, they have managed to stir up a portion of their base customers, and mostly not in a good way.
doconeill said:I don't think it will hurt Disney's bottom line, but that's not my problem to worry about. I, like most everyone else, is concern about how it will affect ME. I am part of a portion of their customer base - those who return on average once or more a year, own DVC (which to me means I'm more likely to spend money in the parks per trip since I'm not actively paying for the room), and are knowledgeable about the parks. And one I would think they'd like to retain, whether I represent a similar 0.1%, 1% or 10%.
I don't think this has anything to do with the tendency for mosts to be more negative anyways. I'm just not seeing the "+" in FastPass+ right now. Disney needs to change my opinion.
Yes. And my point is that this "portion" likely represents a very small number of whatever we're calling a "base customer" -- and a really small number of their overall audience.
And the other boards are largely the same -- it's more than just online -- those with negative things to say are more likely to voice opinions. Especially when those who oppose get accused of ridiculous things like I was.
Just saying you really cannot draw ANY conclusions from the tiny, heavily skewed sample on DIS or any other board.
the same can be said about every decision the company has ever made. Every change will make some small part of the customer base to be unhappy. This one seems to be designed to make more people more happy than it makes less happy. That's a win.
ilovemk76 said:And many of ones on the other sites who are unhappy the exact same posters as on here.
You comment about the negative is true. When we had to leave early due to Sandy, I asked to speak to a manager. When I told her that I wanted to let her know how helpful CMs A, B and C were helping us get something done so we could leave, the manager thanked us for a positive story. She said most of the time when a manager is called it is to be complained to not to compliment about a CM.