Horror stories aside, flying is soooo much more convenient, safer and economical. You cant just look at the price of gas when calculating cost. Wear and tear on your minivan and on your body as well as the cost of your time has to be considered along with the tangible cost of hotels, food, gas, etc
Keep in mind, I"m not trying to be contentious on this...I just want to show you why it makes "sense" to some people.
We drive for roughly 1/2 (sometimes, depending on air fares at the time, 1/3) what it would cost us to fly. That includes gas, hotel, and food. That's for 5 of us. This time, the cheapest air fare I could find has been hovering just over $1200 for the 5 of us, with cruddy departure times and layovers. We'll drive, assuming current gas prices, for around $350 round trip. Hotels will be another $150 (that's one on the way down AND one on the way back, totaled), and food will be another $75 (breakfast is included at both hotels, we're bringing dinner with us the first night down and the first night back, so we're only on the hook one lunch, each way). That's $575, total.
I DO get paid to do the drive, actually, as I'm taking vacation time and we're driving on "work days". I MIGHT save one vacation day by flying, rather than driving (depending on flight times, prices, etc).
I'm not sure how to quantify wear and tear on the vehicle. Maybe 8 cents a mile?
On my body? I do 2 hours of round trip commute every day to work. I actually LIKE to drive and find it sort of relaxing...scary, I know.
Taking ALL that into account, I still save a few hundred bucks, at least. And that's being generous and adding in the "cost" of the extra vacation day and NOT adding the cost of a rental car onto the "flying" scenario.
I'm a number crunching, data analyzing, IT kinda guy as a profession. For our family size, this makes the most fiscal sense even when comparing money savings vs convenience. If we had a smaller family, maybe not so much. But as you can see, there are certainly scenarios..and we're coming from CT, too...where it CAN be a cost savings even when taking into account the things you mentioned.
I have always flown
Dozens of times, but Ive always wanted to try driving once just to say I did it. So, next Feb 09 (Presidents week) Im planning on joining the club when the four of us drive from Connecticut. I probably wont be getting $200 R/T fares that week and in Feb there is better chance of bad weather so it is good time to have the flexibility of driving. Even though I prefer flying, I am excited about trying driving because it will be fun to plan and the drive itself will be an adventure, I am sure.
We "discovered" driving back in 2001...when our trip was scheduled about a week after 9/11. My wife was NOT going to fly, but also didn't want to cancel the trip....so we settled on driving. Did both legs in straight shots. We liked the drive (SOUTH OF THE BORDER, anyone?). But on future trips, more often than not, we flew....because it was cheaper to do so. Even after my daughter was born, we flew because it was cheaper. We talked about driving, even went so far as to "plan" to drive one trip...til we stumbled across $99 round trip airfare out of Bradley about 3 weeks before the trip.
Then, my son was born. We flew the last time when he was very young...he was a lap rider, but the minute he needed his own seat, and as air fares began to rise dramatically (we're talking 2006-ish)...we started to drive. Then my youngest daughter was born, and there was NO chance we were flying anymore. It was WAY too expensive. In addition, 5 seats together is tough/impossible, and leaving one parent with 2 kids was lilkewise tough. We've driven ever since, and will more than likely be driving in about 6 weeks.
But if a decent airfare pops up, Ill probably jump on it. Unless you have an unbelievable fear of flying, I dont understand how you can prefer driving that far. Who knows, after my adventure in Feb, maybe Ill understand and be hooked too
"Preference" is maybe too strong a word. If all things were equal, flying was cheap(er...or even just closer to the cost of driving), and we could get seats together to wrangle our kids, I'd choose to fly. It IS more convenient, and it's certainly quicker.
But when weighing all factors for OUR family, the driving scenario enables us to spend the money we save on "other stuff" on our trip. We COULD afford to fly, but then we'd likely have to economize on other facets of the trip. So instead, we choose to make the trade off. It's probably NOT for everyone. I thank the heavens every day our kids are good travellers...because if they weren't I'd pay the extra simply to get it over with in 4 hours (round trip).
Maybe now you can see why some people "prefer" it...
