Colleen27
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2007
- Messages
- 24,190
If they had the skills and the ability to do the job.
It isn't that simple, though. An employer has to think about absenteeism, which is directly related to health, as well as about public perception of the company (if the position involves working with customers). There is a strong workforce bias against the obese and there is some factual basis to justify that.
The only poor choice she may be making is going on vacation with the money that she does have. But she is using her EIC money and some she has saved. Nothing that she says she is using for Disney would change the fact that she qualifies for food stamps. Should she go to Disney? I can't answer that. I wouldn't if it was me, because I know that there are other things I would need the money for. But, if her housing is paid for, she has food in the house and her bills are paid and her kids are clothed and that is what she wants to do with every extra dime; then yes, it is HER choice.
I think that gets into muddy waters. If the money is spent on Disney, does that mean the person receiving food stamps will then also be looking to emergency aid to cover a household or car repair, a higher-than-expected utility bill, a medical issue, or other expenses that the "extra" money spent on a vacation could cover? That's the reason I'm opposed to the asset limit being as low as it is - it discourages people who receive aid from squirreling away a little cash to cover those everyday emergencies, which in turn makes them more likely to need additional aid if any of those things arise. We should encourage people receiving aid to put away whatever they can afford, even if it is just coupon savings and spare change, to have a small cushion to help them cope. That's a big first step to a more solid financial footing.