Joeblack
Proud DVC Member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2000
- Messages
- 573
In response to another thread started before, here's a rough and conservative analysis on break-even of points. Let's assume we bought 150 points at 70/pt (I am sure 90% of owners bought cheaper than this), an interest rate of 8% (although no matter how hard I try I can hardly get 5% theses days), a point rental of a preferred studio at BWV in choice season (it would take less points at OKW and owners do maximize points by not reserving on weekends and going in lower seasons), and a rack rate at a deluxe hotel of $300/night including taxes. We will also assume that inflation and resort price increases cancel out increases in dues and interest over earned interest.
-Initial Investment: (150x70) $10500
-Income Lost for not investing the money at 8% $10500x0.08= $840
-Annual Dues $4x150 $600
-Total Year/Cost for 150 points at BWV $840+$600 = $1440
-Total Annual Cost per point: $1440/150 = $9.6
-Total Cost of staying 11 nights in a studio paying cash: $300x11= $3300
-Total Cost in Points for the same stay at a BWV Preferred Studio: 154
-Total Cost in $ for BWV owner using poitns for the same stay: $9.6 x 154 = $1478
-Net amount of money an owner saves per year by using his/her points= $3000 - $1478 = $1521
-Number of years to recoup the initial investment in DVC: $10500/1521 = 6.9 years
Like I mentioned before, many other variables could change this outcome, but roughly, the result is that an investment in DVC will pay itself in 7 years. Now, if EPV opens in 2004, there will still be 38 use years for owners. More than enough to recoup their investment.
Why would BCV or WLV owners who will get roughly 40 years of use belong to an "outdated" DVC I and EPV owners belong to "DVC II"?
If points/day are higher at EPV than at the other resorts (I am quite confident that will not be the case), then I would see no reason to exchange into it. It will have no better location than the other resorts and it's unlikely that ammenities or luxury will be that significant over the other resorts.
-Initial Investment: (150x70) $10500
-Income Lost for not investing the money at 8% $10500x0.08= $840
-Annual Dues $4x150 $600
-Total Year/Cost for 150 points at BWV $840+$600 = $1440
-Total Annual Cost per point: $1440/150 = $9.6
-Total Cost of staying 11 nights in a studio paying cash: $300x11= $3300
-Total Cost in Points for the same stay at a BWV Preferred Studio: 154
-Total Cost in $ for BWV owner using poitns for the same stay: $9.6 x 154 = $1478
-Net amount of money an owner saves per year by using his/her points= $3000 - $1478 = $1521
-Number of years to recoup the initial investment in DVC: $10500/1521 = 6.9 years
Like I mentioned before, many other variables could change this outcome, but roughly, the result is that an investment in DVC will pay itself in 7 years. Now, if EPV opens in 2004, there will still be 38 use years for owners. More than enough to recoup their investment.
Why would BCV or WLV owners who will get roughly 40 years of use belong to an "outdated" DVC I and EPV owners belong to "DVC II"?
If points/day are higher at EPV than at the other resorts (I am quite confident that will not be the case), then I would see no reason to exchange into it. It will have no better location than the other resorts and it's unlikely that ammenities or luxury will be that significant over the other resorts.