Klayfish
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- May 19, 2016
- Messages
- 8,747
It's all subjective. I'd disagree with the disagreement
that FP+ is simple, easy and fun. I think it's all of those, I'm a huge fan of FP+.
From the WDW side, I'm sure it's a very difficult problem to have, and essentially a no-win situation. They're not going to please everyone no matter what they do. If there is no FP+ system or advanced reservation system of any kind and everyone just has to stand in line for every ride, IMO that would be a debacle. You'd have hoards of people melting down. The old paper system had its' flaws. For example, back then if you wanted to ride TSMM with a FP+ you had little choice except to get to the gates for rope drop and rush to the kiosk...then hope someone leading a tour group with 50 cards in their hand wasn't in front of you. Plus, you had no control over what time your reservation was and you literally had to run from ride to ride to get your FP+. It allowed no flexibility at all. I can see where that leads to unhappy guests (I was one of them). The existing FP+ system isn't perfect either, some of the concerns are outlined in this thread. I can see how that might get some people upset. So what is the "right" answer? Frankly, I don't see one. They have to make the best of the situation. I think it's them reacting to guests. That's not to "blame" guests, because it's not a matter of anyone doing anything wrong. But it plays out over and over. If you allow guests to only get FP+ at the kiosk, they're going to flock to them and literally run. If you allow guests to get FP+ at 60 days, they're going to be waiting on the computer for the clock to change (just like checking into an airline flight). If they made it 26 days, 19 days, 3.14 days, it would be the same scenario. WDW is very popular, people want to get on the attractions. There's no easy way to do it. Whatever they come up with is probably going to have weak points and make some people unhappy. I happen to like the current system, but that's just my own opinion.

From the WDW side, I'm sure it's a very difficult problem to have, and essentially a no-win situation. They're not going to please everyone no matter what they do. If there is no FP+ system or advanced reservation system of any kind and everyone just has to stand in line for every ride, IMO that would be a debacle. You'd have hoards of people melting down. The old paper system had its' flaws. For example, back then if you wanted to ride TSMM with a FP+ you had little choice except to get to the gates for rope drop and rush to the kiosk...then hope someone leading a tour group with 50 cards in their hand wasn't in front of you. Plus, you had no control over what time your reservation was and you literally had to run from ride to ride to get your FP+. It allowed no flexibility at all. I can see where that leads to unhappy guests (I was one of them). The existing FP+ system isn't perfect either, some of the concerns are outlined in this thread. I can see how that might get some people upset. So what is the "right" answer? Frankly, I don't see one. They have to make the best of the situation. I think it's them reacting to guests. That's not to "blame" guests, because it's not a matter of anyone doing anything wrong. But it plays out over and over. If you allow guests to only get FP+ at the kiosk, they're going to flock to them and literally run. If you allow guests to get FP+ at 60 days, they're going to be waiting on the computer for the clock to change (just like checking into an airline flight). If they made it 26 days, 19 days, 3.14 days, it would be the same scenario. WDW is very popular, people want to get on the attractions. There's no easy way to do it. Whatever they come up with is probably going to have weak points and make some people unhappy. I happen to like the current system, but that's just my own opinion.