It is contraindicated in children under 2. As a child I was on it basically from birth. (Sadly, not joking. My asthma went misdiagnosed for years and my pediatrician had me on this for the first 10 years of my life). Doctors on the ship are not US trained. I am unsure if they could "sue" based on the fact she was given that medication alone. (Thought I bet they will try). She shouldn't have been given that drug, but she is fine now. There is no risk to the baby afterwards and she suffered no ill effect from the medication. They don't have to worry about it now. However, some people are litigation happy and this family seems to be one of them. Why else would you be constantly going to the media with this? I doubt they had the baby removed because they gave her the wrong medication. More likely, the doctor isn't a pediatrician and was unaware of the restriction to children under 2. (There have been other cases with this medication has been given in ERs in the US and Dr.'s not being aware of the change in age.) I still believe the child was removed because she was sick. Lastly, the doctor given that prescription makes me feel even more strongly that the baby was vomiting, not just spitting up. Unfortunately, when you see a doctor on the ship, you have to know you aren't seeing US trained physicians and things can be different then how they are done in the US. This is difficult, I realize, for those who are not medically trained and I was thankful when our DD had to go to the clinic on the ship to have my husband with her. (He is a pediatrician). I don't know if that medication is contraindicated across the globe for children under 2? Not sure if that is a US FDA ruling, or something warned on the drug itself. I don't prescribe medication, so I would have to ask my husband that. Would be interesting to know. They seem to be gearing up for a lawsuit. Sad, but obviously, that is there intention.