The best kind of practice there isToday I practiced taking a nap so that I can stay sharp for that during MW..
My whole life must be exhausting because I regularly go to bed at 8:30pmFalling asleep at 8 or 8:30 in the evening kind of exhausted
@DopeyBadger OR anyone else with race experience can you talk through with me the pros and cons of *racing* this local half marathon on September 18th? Completing Dopey is my most important goal, but I don't want to abandon everything else by being super conservative in pursuit of that.
Full disclosure: if I decide to race this, I'm trying to PR it (which means faster than 2:49:41, or 12:57 pace, which I feel like would be doable.) My long run pace is 13:00 under ideal conditions, marathon pace is 11:55, and HM is 11:26. I think that if I did race and PR it, it would be a good mental boost for me, and as it's also kind of an expensive race ($80 for the half) I am hesitant to spend that much money for "just" a training run.
Yes. Things have come up during the training runs. I try to make sure I thoroughly document that stuff so if my PT asks for specifics I have a place to be able to say "oh yeah, on this day I felt like X, Y, but not Z." I have admittedly been trying to be careful with my ankle issues through training because I want to keep it from getting worse (for example stopping to stretch after the uphill on my 7mi run because I could feel my calf getting really tight and uphills especially make it clench up.) Could I have pushed through most of those things? Yes. But right now because it's "just" training, I don't.Dopey is so far away from a Sept 18th HM it's mostly irrelevant to the discussion. About the only concern related to the 9/18 HM and Dopey would be if you suffered a major injury. If you suffer a major injury, then it will negatively impact your ability to train for Dopey. But that's about it. If it were a HM in mid-November, then there's a discussion about pros/cons to racing it, but not 9/18.
Honestly, that's about the extent of the cons to racing it. If your training has been inconsistent or haphazard, then your chances for an injury are higher. If the training has been mostly to plan, then your chance of injury is lower. But re-reading the last several pages of updates does show a pattern of things coming up during your training runs.
I've been using the pacing chart that you made for me last year. Using my HR data, it seems like they're pretty appropriate, but if that's something I should look into addressing (some sort of time trial) I can do that as well. The actual scheduled run for Sunday is a 5k race or time trial that I was planning on making into a long run.Have you done anything recently to confirm these are still appropriate training paces? You've done a single mile in 11:05 (not as a mile time trial, but just the fastest mile mentioned I could find), you ran a tough but not all out 5k in 34:51 (11:13), you did three miles in 12:14, you did five miles in 12:34 pace (but that did include a break to cheer), 7 miles at 12:45 pace. Some breaks, mentions of ankle soreness, calf stretching mentioned in these runs. Obviously none being "A" effort racing, but more than nothing in terms of data.
I don't know? That's about as honest as I can get with that. I *feel* like I could probably run a 2:40 just looking at my training stuff, but I also know that sometimes I'm overly ambitious and the fact that my training has NOT be as consistent as I want so far this summer is a factor. That 2:49HM was also 2 weeks after I had initially injured my ankle last year, and I didn't run at all for 2 weeks leading up to it. So who knows what I could/should have been able to do.If you just simply base the HM prediction on the not all out 5k, then you're looking at 2:40 (12:14 pace) if fully trained. If you did race it, and PR'd by 1 second (2:49:40) would it provide you a mental boost? Or is there an amount of time that you'd have to PR by for it to provide a mental boost? And if you ran 2:49:42 (one second slower than PR), how would that effect you mentally?
Could I have pushed through most of those things? Yes. But right now because it's "just" training, I don't.
I've been using the pacing chart that you made for me last year. Using my HR data, it seems like they're pretty appropriate, but if that's something I should look into addressing (some sort of time trial) I can do that as well. The actual scheduled run for Sunday is a 5k race or time trial that I was planning on making into a long run.
I don't know? That's about as honest as I can get with that. I *feel* like I could probably run a 2:40 just looking at my training stuff, but I also know that sometimes I'm overly ambitious and the fact that my training has NOT be as consistent as I want so far this summer is a factor. That 2:49HM was also 2 weeks after I had initially injured my ankle last year, and I didn't run at all for 2 weeks leading up to it. So who knows what I could/should have been able to do.
If I was trying to PR a race, then yes, to an extent I would push through things until it got to a certain point. 4 months ago that would be limping. When the limping started, it was time to walk, or stop and stretch and see if running could happen. (It's important to note that I haven't limped on a run since I started PT.) That's the nice thing about my usual route....I'm not really ever more than about a mile from home if I need to pull the plug. If it got to the point where it would be really close to a PR and things didn't feel great, there's no sense in pushing it and risking the injury (obviously) especially since we aren't talking about a possible POT or anything.Will you try and push through those things in a race setting? One in which you're close to a PR, but then could detrimentally hurt your Dopey training?
Well I guess it looks like I'm going to haul myself (and possibly DH) down to the trail where it's flat on Sunday morning for a 5k time trial.Yea, it's hard to say definitively without hard data. Typically I like to see training paces based on something accomplished in the last six months. But if there's other data that's not from a race, like from a suitable training run, then I'll hear the argument. Otherwise, I defer to going to a time trial (or race). Just because those were the training paces that were appropriate last year doesn't mean they're still appropriate. They very well may be, but I like to see something back it up. So if you're looking to get a good idea on what you're capable of for the HM in Sept and looking at some goal setting, then running a 5k or 10k is a good idea. It gives you data to use to determine whether your current training is appropriate and what you should be aiming for in Sept. That's as long as you believe you're healthy to run these races without furthering injury.
If you intend on "A" racing the HM in Sept, then you'll improve your time in that race by having a good idea what pace to shoot for based on either 5k/10k races or time trial data. That way you can have a good pacing strategy. If the training has been inconsistent, all the more reason to run the shorter distance race for assessment purposes. It only means the HM will be worse off from an ideal race equivalency because inconsistent training more likely effects endurance than it will speed.
I agree with @DopeyBadger that the real question here is if you'll be ready to race a HM in 6 weeks versus impact on Dopey. I'm not as familiar with your training history but do you think you can realistically get the adequate training in between now and then? If you were starting from zero, my advice would be to aim for something shorter. However, I know you aren't quite at zero but you're also still rehabbing an injury so you're at higher injury risk than others if you ramp up too quickly.@DopeyBadger OR anyone else with race experience can you talk through with me the pros and cons of *racing* this local half marathon on September 18th? Completing Dopey is my most important goal, but I don't want to abandon everything else by being super conservative in pursuit of that.
T+D for this date is usually OK (not ideal, but not terrible), course is extremely flat, but is not paved, and should be mostly shaded. Copy/paste from my previous post for T+D info:
2021: 97 (113 by 11am)
2020: 72 (84 by 11am)
2019: 124 (138 by 11am)
2018: 118 (stayed steady)
2017: 104 (112 by 11am)
So averaging 103 for the start and 113 at 11am.
Full disclosure: if I decide to race this, I'm trying to PR it (which means faster than 2:49:41, or 12:57 pace, which I feel like would be doable.) My long run pace is 13:00 under ideal conditions, marathon pace is 11:55, and HM is 11:26. I think that if I did race and PR it, it would be a good mental boost for me, and as it's also kind of an expensive race ($80 for the half) I am hesitant to spend that much money for "just" a training run.
I understand that there's some risk of injury by racing this, and how my ankle is doing would probably be a deciding factor in whether I treat it as a training run or a race. But I also know that, for example, when I did my 7mi long run a week and a half ago, I ran that in 12:45 pace when it was 80 out (but the last mile sucked.)
I'm using this week as a bridge week to get back into the groove and am planning on picking up where I "should" be on Sunday (not pictured) with a 7 or 8mi long run. My "weeks" start on Monday, and the last column is the weekly total mileage. I've re-arranged the Tuesday rest day because it works better for me to run that day since it's a non-work day. I also probably won't do that 10k as a time trail. Probably just a HM pace run.
View attachment 690660
I feel like I'm kind of talking in circles, but mostly I just want to make sure I'm not going to mess stuff up (and logically I *know* I won't because I ran a whole marathon last year before Goofy, but this year's training has looked different from last year also) and that I'm not biting off too much.