mom2rtk
Invented the term "Characterpalooza"
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2008
- Messages
- 62,859
Wow... still the top thread on page one.
Can we say 'beating a dead horse....'
Anyhow, before I take off here... I will clarify.
I am from a large family with many siblings.
If one has children, then one should be prepared to be a parent to EACH of them, as their lives unfold.
God forbid that my son's wedding day be considered any kind of 'inconvenience'.
God forbid that one of my siblings were to get 'their YEAR'.
I WILL be, hopefully, 'the mother of the groom' one day, to our only son and only child.
I will say, 200%, without any doubt or hesitation, that my thoughts have absolutely NOTHING to do with any in-law issues.
When my son gets engaged and married, I most certainly will NOT, EVER, expect him and his bride to change their date because of my convienience.
NOT A CHANCE....
My son and his bride should decide to get married and make their wedding plans when life circumstances are best for THEM.
Period.
They can have a huge wedding affair, and we will help and participate as much as our financial ability is, at that tiime.
He might meet his bride who is not from this area, as my nephew did, and choose to have the wedding in her home-town area.
They might choose to get married on a beach somewhere.
They might choose to elope.
I do not expect to plan the time, date, venue, flowers, and even GOD FORBID, the dress that is beautiful in the the young ladies eyes.
I only hope that my eyes are there to see the joy on my son's (and his bride's) faces!!!
I want that day to be beautiful and perfect for my son and his bride, for THEM.
I have no preconceived notions that any of it should be about me.
So, as you can see, any thoughts and opinions here definitely apply to me as the mother of the engaged.
Not, just to 'in-laws'.
When it comes to a wedding, and to each of the engaged couple, BOTH parents/families are 'in-laws'.
I guess it's pretty safe to assume that you will never have 2 kids get married 2 months apart then?
And just as an aside, those who were not supportive of the "2 weddings in 2 months" approach here never said they would not be supportive and enjoy the moment with their child regardless of when it happened. Just that they thought maybe the MIL in this case had a point and deserved some consideration.

