The contract isn't as cut and dry as that. It mentions non-refundable multiple times, but it also makes provisions for availability of the reservation - which can't be available if the resort is closed.
Just to be clear as well, there are different types of "cancellation" which may be adding to the confusion.
1) Renter initiated cancellation. (ie, change in circumstance, no longer wants to or can't go)
2) Owner initiated cancellation. (ie, change of heart, no longer wants to rent)
3) Disney initiated cancellation. (ie, Resort Closure)
Most
DVC contracts have accounted for 1 & 2. If it's 1, no refund. Owner gets payment. If it's 2, no payment. Owner has to refund. Situation #3 is not clearly accounted for in the current contract, which leaves it to interpretation and arguing over if it's 1 or 2.
I've been thinking a lot of the contract as well. Beyond the contract, this will set precedence to how the brokers operate. A rather simple inventory change would alleviate the risk here. If they have a good enough database of UY for people; the brokers can simply make sure reservations are not approaching UY. Meaning, if Davids has a renter for May; they can make an internal process change to avoid using a June UY to fulfill that reservation. Instead build it in so that any potential cancellation would allow the owner to bank and start with a minimum of October UY. Or, utilize one that is already past the banking point. Sure it would stress the inventory a little, but I'd imagine that would give a lot of peace of mind to owners and renters of not having to worry about the fight (as much) over contract language. I'd imagine owners would complain a lot less about "non-refundable" if their points were able to be fully usable/bankable still.