When I was in high school there was a weight added to the grade for ranking. An A earned in a level 1 class (special ed) was not worth as much as an A earned in a level 2 class (normal) which in turn was not worth as much as an A earned in a level 3 class (honors).
In that situation someone taking some level 3 classes and earning a 3.5 would be ranked higher than a student taking all level 2 classes and earning a 3.5. If anyone took any level 1 classes and had a 3.5 they would be ranked 3rd of the 3.
It astounds me that this method of weighting hasn't been legally challenged. I know when my sister worked in university admissions, they threw out the GPAs from schools that used those weighting methods and recalculated on their own.
The student isn't an NHS member. My cousin told me that NHS rules vary from chapter to chapter. The chapter that the school is under doesn't induct special ed students. My cousin reviewed a current class ranking with the school's guidance counselor a few days ago. She said that in the top 25 the special ed is ranked 11th. Most of the students in the top 25 are NHS members and my cousin has said that even a few students who aren't in NHS are upset about the girl's ranking. The issue is more with class rankings.
I hope that was just an omitted word
I can really see both sides of the issue but since there is only one special ed student it could get really, really, really ugly for the school legally. I would not sign my name on ANYTHING related to his issue because it will only come back to bite you in the rear.
I agree. In my district, a teacher would probably be fired for signing or involving themselves, if for no other reason than the potential legal ramifications for the district.
I can also see were they are upset due to girl's reading level. I think a lot of it has to do with class rank and the fact the girl never passed the state competency exam. Like I mentioned in a previous post one reason students are upset is because of certain scholarships that awarded on class rankings and percentages.
The girl's reading level is none of their business. As others have pointed out, students with text-centered disabilities aren't going to score well on tests. Test anxiety will also often produce (often inaccurately) low scores.
I cannot believe people would even...really...I don't even know what to say without getting points.
I was thinking that, too.
Not to mention that isn't how it works in the real world and school is supposed to be preparing someone for the real world. I'd love to go into a board meeting and let them know I tried really hard to not allow a data breach but one happened. They would be unimpressed with my effort and look at my lack of result and I don't blame them, life is about results. Get them or someone else will.
I would venture a guess that you selected your career based on what you are good at. I would venture a guess that this young lady could also put together an effective presentation in an area of her interest and skill.
In the adult, work world, we are specialized. We don't expect every adult to be able to do every thing well.
I have 2 kids that were special ed students. Part of their learning disability was that they had problem with tests. My DS had scores that ranged from village idiot to genius depending on how he played fill in the blanks. He had a processing disorder that made taking tests extremely difficult.
This girl is telling her ranking, so what. I would think it was in response to everyone else sharing their ranks. If I were the parent of this child in question I would be talking to a lawyer. She has fulfulled the requirements for her district therefore she deserves the honors. If these parents do not like the system they need to address that but not at the expense of this student. It is a shame that as a society in general we have losy any sense of compassion for our fellow human beings. IMHO anyway.
Well said! I particularly enjoyed the bolded part---and it's so true for such a range of kids. I am not completely against testing, but to assume that it's accurate for every kid is not realistic. We are dealing with human beings, not little robots!
I love this kind of obtuse post...
It really isn't obtuse if you think of special education as what it is---providing students with a disability with the accommodations they need to be successful. Eye glasses are actually an exquisitely accurate analogy.
FIL has a master's in Electrical Engineering. Both he and my dh are very dyslexic, and neither reads well. Fortunately for them, that discipline required few English classes.
Exactly---adults specialize, kids don't get to.
To be fair, we use a text to speech program for our sight impaired employees for email and document creation, but those employees could never hold executive positions, and they can all read in one way or another. There is too much that cannot be processed by those programs, like financial analysis...
A computer can read the textbooks now. It is part of the IDEA act. Our high school is not very large...about 1000 students. That is about 250 students a grade. We have a very high GPA school and they feel class rank is not fair. In other words, you could have a 3.5 and be ranked 150! Our school does not give out class rank to colleges, only GPA.
LOVE this! Best idea ever. I am going to share it with my principal. If we are clear with kids about what they need to do, everyone should have a shot at a 4.0. It doesn't need to be all about rankings.
I am really saddened by some of the insensitivity shown here. I think we all accept that not everyone looks the same, nor should they---not everyone's brain works the same, either, nor should it.