LuvOrlando
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2006
- Messages
- 21,319
So I just had another conversation with my MIL over whether or not American Kids are actually getting a substandard education.
I happen to think that the reason our aggregate test scores are so much lower than when compared to other countries has more to do with our testing practices than the kids. In this country we have an egalitarian society. As a result everyone who is enrolled in a school gets tested, even kids who can't hold a pencil or understand the questions are tested. Then these kids' scores are rolled into an average along with everyone else. So how do you take these numbers and compare them to other countries who are so philosophically different from ours? Countries where kids' may have to test into going to school in the first place? Countries where the poor, disabled or immigrant populations never get access? I think that if we were to use the same standards as the countries we are being compared to the picture would look a whole lot different. BTW, I am not saying we shouldn't include these groups, I'm just saying apples can't be compared to oranges.
Now MIL thinks I am way off base and that every country uses the same standards.
What do you think? Does anyone know how these other countries collect their education data and if they exclude poor performing groups or not?
I happen to think that the reason our aggregate test scores are so much lower than when compared to other countries has more to do with our testing practices than the kids. In this country we have an egalitarian society. As a result everyone who is enrolled in a school gets tested, even kids who can't hold a pencil or understand the questions are tested. Then these kids' scores are rolled into an average along with everyone else. So how do you take these numbers and compare them to other countries who are so philosophically different from ours? Countries where kids' may have to test into going to school in the first place? Countries where the poor, disabled or immigrant populations never get access? I think that if we were to use the same standards as the countries we are being compared to the picture would look a whole lot different. BTW, I am not saying we shouldn't include these groups, I'm just saying apples can't be compared to oranges.
Now MIL thinks I am way off base and that every country uses the same standards.
What do you think? Does anyone know how these other countries collect their education data and if they exclude poor performing groups or not?