Gumbo4x4
Note to the ladies who forgot to
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2012
As to what would happen to the animals if the numbers weren't kept down by hunting - if you look at some of the studies done on places (like animal preserves) where hunting is stopped, the natural balance will resume over time. The numbers will increase to the maximum capacity and then decrease. New predators will move into the area. And predators take the sicker, weaker animals rather than going for the biggest, most impressive ones.
This type of utopia can only take place on a massive scale, and even then it is a rarity when it works. Controlling deer in a suburban area could never work with a hands off approach. And even in extremely rural areas, removing man from the equation can be disastrous - example, the anti fur campaign has resulted in many species of bird being driven to near extinction. Man has harvested fur for thousands of years & these animals depend on man to control their numbers. The lack of such control has caused a boom among those animals and they've decimated more delicate species.
In Africa, elephants left unchecked would destroy their habitat, turning it into a desert incapable of supporting elephants for hundreds of years. Were they allowed to roam the whole of Africa, this wouldn't be a problem. But, that's not realistic.
The fact is because man has altered the habitat, it is man's responsibility to maintain the balance.
None of this is "why" I hunt. But, it is "why" I will never apologize for hunting.