jekjones1558
Always happy at Disney
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2000
- Messages
- 9,479
Yeah, I thought it was pretty funny, and stole it!
Yours for the taking!
Thanks! I added it to my home e-mail signature!

Yeah, I thought it was pretty funny, and stole it!
Yours for the taking!
The truth is we have no way of knowing how they've done this correctly for each unit or if the technicalities balance out. And it really doesn't matter from a practical point as long as it balances as a resort unless you're trying to look for a place to put one's ax. But the gyrations trying to pin it to each unit size and each season is somewhat amusing.I agree with that Dean the way the OP put it was that a specific room could not increase in point over the year. The way that i took his comment was, for instance that this studio at ssr has to have the same point allocation as it did last year.
There is a clause that allows it, you are correct. Yes it could get real ugly, fast with all they can do.
Always knew they had a bag of hammers, just didnt think they would break them out all at once. That was until they took the mugs away and extended OKW. Then I knew they were not concerned about current members, only getting new ones to replace us.
No, you just paid attention and listened, instead of hearing what you wanted to hear.
I would wager that no guide ever told a buyer, that points for a specific room in a given season would never go up.
The truth is we have no way of knowing how they've done this correctly for each unit or if the technicalities balance out. And it really doesn't matter from a practical point as long as it balances as a resort unless you're trying to look for a place to put one's ax. But the gyrations trying to pin it to each unit size and each season is somewhat amusing.
TJ, I really do not want to get into a back and forth between just us, as we obviously disagree. I have already voiced my complaint to DVC.
See to me the things they do that they know will be well recieved by the membership they do a good job of letting us know about it.
They definitely do a good job about anything that involves spending money with them.
But things that might not be well received by the membership, the $95 fee change, the banking changes, the removal of glassware, the lowering of water temps in pools, and this one, and I am sure there are others, that have slipped my tired mind, they seem to try to just slide it past us and hope we don't notice and put out that disclaimer of "due to member feedback".
I would suggest anyone that is unhappy with the change for whatever reason, be it the actual change or the manner in which it was presented, contact them.
I know they are reading here, but they really need to hear from us personally.
The one thing that I don't understand in this thread is that it does not bother me that some are glad about the change or don't even care one way or the other, but it does seem it bothers some that others are not happy with the change.![]()
Without a priority for booking a full week, the weekends would get taken and the weekdays left fairly empty. EVERY points system I know of that allows shorter bookings has a higher total for weekends vs weekdays, some more than others.I never understood why DVC didn't just give point values to specific "seasons" (ie. value, dream, etc.) per week & then just divide them by 7, meaning each night would be worth the same amount of points.
Scenario: 2BR at OKW during Dream Season = 210 points or 30 points per day.
That would be too easy though.
I know some folks were openly cynical about the "due to member demand" comments regarding the booking windows...but look what happened. It actually worked and people really DO seem satisfied with the change!
We have to both concede that neither of us knows, nor will we ever know, What DVC's intentions were with respect to banking and borrowing when the rule was put in place.
My belief is that is was so members could save during the rainy season and borrow during the sunny season.
I don't believe the system was ever put in place with the expressed intention of affording someone the opportunity to buy 1/3 of a year's points to bank and borrow to use exactly that number of points every 3 years. Sorry. I just don't buy it. Can it be used that way? Certainly. But when it doesn't work anymore, I think it's safe to say that wasn't what DVC designed it into the system for but that's just my opinion.
I agree Sammie. I would never presume to tell someone they should not be upset that their dream is now out of reach. For many DVC was a dream, something they waited for, saved for and even begged their DH for![]()
I try to put people first and it has served me well. People have a valid right to be upset if they are, and it is insulting to tell them otherwise. Im glad for those it helps (me included) but I also realize that many of my fellow members did not fare so well and were unfairly treated, or downright ripped off with BLT.
I read about 20 pages ago that there might be a mistake in the 2010 points chart. Has this been resolved?
If not, who exactly is everyone complaining to? Their guide? Member services? Thanks
Someone inquired earlier about the original 1991 OKW point chart. I scanned it, but it was over a Mb, and I didn't want people on slower connection to have to wait to load it, so I did a spreadsheet. Look at the weekday to weekend differences.
![]()
Good post in most cases it was 2.5 x the weekday rate so it there was no reason not to change it. If i bought in then i too would not go on weekends.
But i am pretty sure if i did buy in then i to would be complaining when they changed the charts in 96 the same way they are complaining now. I do remember one post saying that the disboards did not even exist then. i wolud imagine that if it did it would be just as busy if not more.
So i totally understand that some people are upset and they have every right to be, especially BLT owners.
TJ, I really do not want to get into a back and forth between just us, as we obviously disagree. I have already voiced my complaint to DVC.
The one thing that I don't understand in this thread is that it does not bother me that some are glad about the change or don't even care one way or the other, but it does seem it bothers some that others are not happy with the change.![]()
tjkraz : I can only speak for myself but I don't see posters frequently attacking each-others feelings.
I don't see anyone saying "you are wrong to be upset about this--you should be happy!"