- Joined
- Apr 29, 2004
- Messages
- 38,483
To keep their options openAccording to Reuters:
This says to me that the 5th park is a go. Why else would they commit to "at least $8b" in the next ten years?
To keep their options openAccording to Reuters:
This says to me that the 5th park is a go. Why else would they commit to "at least $8b" in the next ten years?
MK and AK projects are going to cost a lot of money on their own and they might have other projects planned. For reference, I know it's a different country but Fantasy Springs was a two billion dollar project. Galaxy's Edge cost one billion. Guardians was just a coaster build and that was 500 million.
Epic Universe is going to cost somewhere between $7B-$8B according to the Capex line on their financial reports. It is no where close to only $1B.Epic is costing 1 billion dollars. Seems to me, Disney needs someone else in charge of how to spend money and get good contracts and sourcing materials.
A Luca ride would be great. No to live sea creatures. I'm against keeping animals in captivity.What I think could work for Disney is an aquarium and what this aquarium would be part of is a new theme park devoted to the wonders of the ocean and it would consist of four areas and one area could be devoted to animals like seals and sea lions and another area could feature sand dollars seashells and coral reefs and the biggest area would feature animals like whales and there would be dolphin shows too and of course the aquarium would be the centerpiece of the park and feature loads of fish and also theaters where you can see movies about different kinds of ocean life and then you would have character meet and greets with Moana Ariel and a Luca show and also a Finding Nemo ride and a Finding Dory show would be added to the park and Disney's Sea Kingdom "The park's name" would draw in lots of visitors and possibly steal Sea World's business if it were to exist
They could call it SeaWorld. oh wait...What I think could work for Disney is an aquarium and what this aquarium would be part of is a new theme park devoted to the wonders of the ocean and it would consist of four areas and one area could be devoted to animals like seals and sea lions and another area could feature sand dollars seashells and coral reefs and the biggest area would feature animals like whales and there would be dolphin shows too and of course the aquarium would be the centerpiece of the park and feature loads of fish and also theaters where you can see movies about different kinds of ocean life and then you would have character meet and greets with Moana Ariel and a Luca show and also a Finding Nemo ride and a Finding Dory show would be added to the park and Disney's Sea Kingdom "The park's name" would draw in lots of visitors and possibly steal Sea World's business if it were to exist
More likely that some websites need to get better sourcing on their reporting and realize that it isn't feasible to build a theme park this advanced for just one billion. FWIW budget for Super Nintendo World in Osaka was initially 430 mil, according to an announcement made by Universal themselves. That was almost a decade ago and did not include the DK expansion. So it's likely that the Nintendo area alone for Orlando costs at least one billion dollars.Epic is costing 1 billion dollars. Seems to me, Disney needs someone else in charge of how to spend money and get good contracts and sourcing materials.
Attractions are cheaper the 2nd time you make them, because you've already paid for the R&D. That's why so many rides are just clones of others, or Frankenstein versions of existing things. It will be significantly cheaper to make Super Nintendo World for the 3rd time in Orlando than it took for the original or the California builds.More likely that some websites need to get better sourcing on their reporting and realize that it isn't feasible to build a theme park this advanced for just one billion. FWIW budget for Super Nintendo World in Osaka was initially 430 mil, according to an announcement made by Universal themselves. That was almost a decade ago and did not include the DK expansion. So it's likely that the Nintendo area alone for Orlando costs at least one billion dollars.
Things in general aren't as cheap now as they were eight years ago and that should probably be accounted for if we're making guesses as to how much an entire theme park land will cost to build.It will be significantly cheaper to make Super Nintendo World for the 3rd time in Orlando than it took for the original or the California builds.
That makes a lot more sense. No one can build a (half decent) theme park for one billion, that's impossible.Epic Universe is going to cost somewhere between $7B-$8B according to the Capex line on their financial reports. It is no where close to only $1B.
I'm guessing it came from the first result when you google "epic universe construction cost". There are a few other results saying the same, some of them probably just cribbing the info from another, but it doesn't make much sense.That makes a lot more sense. No one can build a (half decent) theme park for one billion, that's impossible.
Why do some posters make up numbers and present them as facts?
That makes a lot more sense. No one can build a (half decent) theme park for one billion, that's impossible.
Why do some posters make up numbers and present them as facts?
Because you have second rate new outlets with stories like this: https://skift.com/2024/01/30/universal-orlando-previews-1-billion-epic-universe-theme-park/. These stories than get picked up by other outlets like Yahoo https://finance.yahoo.com/news/universal-orlando-previews-1-billion-170448309.html and all of a sudden it looks legit.That makes a lot more sense. No one can build a (half decent) theme park for one billion, that's impossible.
Why do some posters make up numbers and present them as facts?
You may not have made it up but it shouldn't take much thought to think the $1B number in the articles we're wrong.Not making up any numbers. Just reading what it is telling me on Yahoo Finance what the park costs. If that is a mistake on their end, that's their problem. Along with other sites when you google the cost
I didn't " make " anything up
Now that I clicked the link it looks like the Skift story was licensed out directly to Yahoo, which is just gross in a different way.Because you have second rate new outlets with stories like this: https://skift.com/2024/01/30/universal-orlando-previews-1-billion-epic-universe-theme-park/. These stories than get picked up by other outlets like Yahoo https://finance.yahoo.com/news/universal-orlando-previews-1-billion-170448309.html and all of a sudden it looks legit.
This makes sense. Why build an entirely new park with the required infrastructure when you can simply add on to your existing park?I've said this a few times, Disney could spend 17Billion just on the 4 existing parks without ever needing to open a 5th. Between the 4 they have several expansion pads available and a lot of remodeling/rework that can happen to make the parks relevant.