Douglas Dubh
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Nov 13, 1999
- Messages
- 4,642
Maybe because costs have also increased 73%?When you look up and see your employer has increased revenues by 73%, it's more than fair to ask why you're not seeing an increase
Maybe because costs have also increased 73%?When you look up and see your employer has increased revenues by 73%, it's more than fair to ask why you're not seeing an increase
Maybe because costs have also increased 73%?
Maybe because costs have also increased 73%?
While I may not like it, I can understand people being indifferent to the struggle of others. What I can never seem to understand, no matter how long I’ve used the internet, is how many people will jump into a conversation with a bunch of made up nonsense and actually put effort into trying to justify why the struggles of others are both good and deserved."Maybe" is doing a lot of work in your sentence and it's not supported by Disney's own information:
See pages 3 and 8 at this link: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiQqti09b37AhWInGoFHXxOBaAQFnoECAkQAQ&url=https://thewaltdisneycompany.com/app/uploads/2022/08/q3-fy22-earnings.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3BTnbFqYCXEiHwBV2YR1-0
I thought we were talking hypothetically, since increased revenues don’t always translate to increased profits. And that’s especially true when the revenues are increased following a very bad year."Maybe" is doing a lot of work in your sentence and it's not supported by Disney's own information:
Just because revenue is up 73% does not mean profits were up 73%.When you look up and see your employer has increased revenues by 73%, it's more than fair to ask why you're not seeing an increase. Disney will raise its prices for inflation to protect that 73%, it will fight tooth and tail to not increase employee wages, also to protect that 73%.
Disney is screwing the folks, both customers and staff, who got them the 73%. How much money is enough?
I do not think people are indifferent to the struggles of others, at least I am not.While I may not like it, I can understand people being indifferent to the struggle of others. What I can never seem to understand, no matter how long I’ve used the internet, is how many people will jump into a conversation with a bunch of made up nonsense and actually put effort into trying to justify why the struggles of others are both good and deserved.
When I first started working for Disney I worked in a location that had a lot of cast members. Every day a Manager would put up a ER "early release" list.Of course, lots of cast members choose not to work full time. If they are scheduled to work eight hours, they’ll request to leave early. Yes, sometimes areas are short staffed and CM’s are required to work long hours. But often they aren’t, and many cast members appreciate not having to work full shifts.
My favorite part of your post is how you start by saying you’re not indifferent to the struggle of others, and then go on for multiple paragraphs about how and why you actually are.I do not think people are indifferent to the struggles of others, at least I am not.
I worked for Disney at a time when $6.00 dollars an hour was starting pay,would I have liked to have made more, sure but I knew what the pay was when I made the desiccation to work for them. I bettered my self within the company and within that first year I transferred to a better job paying $9.00 an hour.
There has to be a starting point, that's what the union is supposed to be doing for it's members.
I just find it odd that people think a person deserves a certain amount of pay based on where a person lives, how big their family is and other factors, not what they bring to the table.
Should a new untrained cast member be paid the same as a cast member who brings lets say 5 years experience as an electrician.
I have always said, for the most part that people are where they are at in life because they want to be there, if they wanted to be some place different they would do everything in their power to do something to be someplace else.
I an not putting down any one or the job they do because all jobs are important.
You don't make enough money as a custodian learn to be a chef.
You don't make enough money as a ride attendant learn to be an electrician.
It's up to them how much money they can make.
I have read my post several times. I am not sure where or how I contradict myself. I may have a different belief to what indifference means.My favorite part of your post is how you start by saying you’re not indifferent to the struggle of others, and then go on for multiple paragraphs about how and why you actually are.
I have read my post several times. I am not sure where or how I contradict myself. I may have a different belief to what indifference means.
If you could point out where and how I constrict my self I could re read it and look to see if I was wrong.
If I am wrong I will be the first to admit.
I blame that solely on the fact many people just aren't interested in the jobs available. IMO many young people are looking for that perfect job.
First off I was not asking you for a response I was asking Pickles516 but thank you, by the way when you capitalize certain word are you yelling at me? I was told thats how people yell on the internet. You have done it in several responses. Yelling never accomplish anything and I think I may have done the same in one of my response to you if I did I apologize..It's the whole "if you don't like your job, or it doesn't pay enough, just get a different one that is better" sentiment.
You ignore the fact that people must work to simply SURVIVE and they:
1. Usually can't afford to just up and quit a job
2. It's kind of hard to learn a new job/train/go to school when you have to work, by YOUR own admission, overtime or 2 or more jobs.
3. Not everyone CAN access higher education (that costs money) or has the skill set to "just do a different job." Some people have learning disabilities, or mental health struggles and simply cannot better themselves, so they have to do whatever job they can get.
4. It takes a great deal of privilege OR good luck (or a combination of those) to truly get ahead in life. Regardless of what you want to believe, there are people who will spend 50 years working as a cook, or a dishwasher, or a ride operator. It's what they can do. Maybe it's what they are best at. Maybe it's what truly makes them happy
Let's just stop pretending that it's as easy as "just get a better job or work hard to move up." Not everyone gets the same opportunities in life.
Saying that it’s odd to you that people want to be able to live in the area in which they work, and should be compensated in a way that facilitates that(which is literally the point of minimum wage). Viewing current cast members through the lens of your experience as one - what, 25-30 years ago? - as if it’s not a completely different economic landscape today. Stating that most people are where they are in life because they want to be there. Those all sound like a particularly outdated bootstrap-level of indifference to me.I have read my post several times. I am not sure where or how I contradict myself. I may have a different belief to what indifference means.
If you could point out where and how I constrict my self I could re read it and look to see if I was wrong.
If I am wrong I will be the first to admit.
Saying that it’s odd to you that people want to be able to live in the area in which they work, and should be compensated in a way that facilitates that(which is literally the point of minimum wage). Viewing current cast members through the lens of your experience as one - what, 25-30 years ago? - as if it’s not a completely different economic landscape today. Stating that most people are where they are in life because they want to be there. Those all sound like a particularly outdated bootstrap-level of indifference to me.
Interesting that wanting people to not needlessly suffer poverty is radical to you.I mean I’m indifferent but you seem a bit radical to me. If someone mentions an opinion of work hard or move on to a job that seems to compensate you the way you feel - it seems to trigger you.
Thank you for your response.Saying that it’s odd to you that people want to be able to live in the area in which they work, and should be compensated in a way that facilitates that(which is literally the point of minimum wage). Viewing current cast members through the lens of your experience as one - what, 25-30 years ago? - as if it’s not a completely different economic landscape today. Stating that most people are where they are in life because they want to be there. Those all sound like a particularly outdated bootstrap-level of indifference to me.
Wanting people not to be in poverty is a notion, not an argument. For it to be an argument, you have to present a different way of doing things that would potentially solve the problem.Interesting that wanting people to not needlessly suffer poverty is radical to you.