There is certainly a huge demand for studios. However, the new Poly building suggests there’s still demand for larger Villas as well (albeit less than studios). It will be interesting to see how many people stay in one of those “resort” studios once, then decide having a 1 or 2bd for the added space is more appealing.
A large part of our justification for DVC was staying in bigger villas, so I'm with you there. However, Walt Disney World itself has something like 25,000 hotel rooms, filled with guests who are content staying in that size room. Additionally, the VGF Resort Studios appear to be the largest Studios in the program.
We all knew there was some demand for larger villas at Poly. If it ends up being one condo association, the balance will likely be very similar to VGF. The new building looks to have about 200 villas, combined with 360 existing studios.
Disneyland Hotel will reportedly have only 19 one bedroom villas and 20 two bedroom villa out of its ~350 rooms. We could argue that there are differences between WDW and DL. Though the more traditional mix hasn't necessarily hurt occupancy at VGC. And if three studios are roughly equal in size and cost to a single Two Bedroom, DVC has every reason to give owners what they believe will be used. If DVC is building a new resort with only 5% 2BR, they must have pretty valid data for doing that. SoCal locals may want shorter stays in smaller rooms, but there are undoubtedly purchase candidates for DLH who will travel in larger groups just like WDW.
Obviously, your example is an extreme situation, but shoehorning 10 humans into 880 square feet sounds miserable and it’s 30% less space than a 2bd. Even if most of that extra space is kitchen, it’s still space.
Me too, but different strokes for different folks. Families put 4-5 people in far less than 440 sq ft
all the time.
I doubt many families of 10 would chose that configuration. (Not many families of 10 even exist.) If you've got a party that spans multiple family groups--One family + grandparents, two separate families (cousins)--two Resort Studios may be preferable to a One Bedroom villa with one family sleeping in the living room and sharing a bathroom. It's also significantly cheaper than a 2BR.
While I have no desire to own at VGF, I would fall squarely into that group of owners who’d likely never stay in a resort studio.
Right now, Deluxe Studios at VGF look better than Resort Studios. But personally (as a VGF owner), I don't see Resort Studios as any massive drop off. I've stayed in OKW and Vero rooms with two queen beds. I've stayed in Studios with one bathroom. I've stayed in DVC studios far smaller than 440 sq ft.
While I may prefer a Deluxe Studio, nothing about the Resort Studio makes me say I'd never stay there.
The question is how many existing “VGF1” owners will jump on the added resort studio availability and free up larger rooms for new owners and if it balances out. With the addition of maybe 10,000 new contracts it will be interesting to see.
Before owning VGF, I stayed there twice on trips booked at 7 months. Looking at what's available now within the home resort priority window, there are few surprises. Rooms are booked up around Thanksgiving, Christmas, WDW Marathon and early December. But the vast majority of that 4-month period still has availability in 1BR and 2BR villas. Even with more points and owners, I don't foresee people having to walk reservations year-round to get what they want.
The most likely outcome is less 1BR and 2BR availability as we get later in the home resort priority period, and far less making it to 7 months.