DIS Shareholders and Stock Info ONLY

Trian’s Objective​


To create sustainable, long-term value at Disney by working WITH Bob Iger & the Board. Trian recognizes that Disney is undergoing a lot of change quickly and is NOT trying to create additional instability. Trian is:


NOT
looking to replace Bob Iger
FOR ensuring successful CEO succession within 2 years

NOT advocating for a break-up of Disney
FOR reinvigorating the Disney “flywheel”

NOT advocating to increase financial leverage

FOR orderly deleveraging

NOT seeking to cut costs that impact product quality or customer experience
FOR driving efficiencies and additional profits

NOT advocating for aggressive price increases at the expense of customers
FOR ensuring customers can get real value across all business lines

NOT advocating for a permanent dividend cut
FOR reinstating the dividend by FY 2025
 
If he does succeed in winning a seat on the board it should scare you.

This is from an article on WSJ.

"Trian, like other activists, is known for encouraging changes at the companies it targets, such as the breakup or sale of underperforming divisions or moves to improve efficiency and better use capital. It often seeks board representation and tries to avoid public spats, unlike some of its more pugnacious rivals."
Au contrare. This is just what the doctor ordered. Nothing has changed my mind that the hot mess of ABC/ESPN needs to be discarded, and right now.

I intend to vote my shares for Peltz just as quickly as I can.
 
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/11/business/disney-board-nelson-peltz.html

Disney Pushes Back Against Activist Investor’s Quest for Board Seat

Nelson Peltz wants the company to revamp its streaming business and focus on increasing profits. Disney wants shareholders to vote against his effort to get a seat on the board.
By Lauren Hirsch and Brooks Barnes
Jan. 11, 2023

The activist investor Nelson Peltz is pushing for a Disney board seat, the company confirmed on Wednesday, saying that it recommended shareholders to vote against his effort. Mr. Peltz, who is known for putting a magnifying glass on costs, wants Disney to revamp its streaming business, refocus on profit growth, reinstate its dividend and clean up the company’s messy succession planning.

In a statement, Disney’s board said that it “remains open to constructive engagement and ideas that help drive shareholder value,” noting that senior company executives and board members had “engaged with Mr. Peltz numerous times over the last few months.”

Trian Partners, the investment firm led by Mr. Peltz, has taken a roughly $900 million stake in Disney, according to two people familiar with the matter, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the board discussions. Trian executives met with Robert A. Iger, Disney’s chief executive, and Christine M. McCarthy, Disney’s chief financial officer, in Los Angeles on Tuesday in an attempt to avoid a proxy battle, the people said. No agreement was reached after the 45-minute meeting.

On Wednesday, Disney offered Mr. Peltz a role as a “board observer” and asked him to sign an agreement that would limit Trian’s ability to buy more shares. Mr. Peltz declined. Later on Wednesday, Trian went public with its campaign with a website called Restore the Magic.

Mr. Peltz, 80, has repeatedly criticized Mr. Iger for orchestrating Disney’s $71.3 billion acquisition of 21st Century Fox assets in 2019. That acquisition, along with the pandemic, loaded Disney with some $45 billion in debt. Mr. Peltz has said that Disney drastically overpaid. The deal, though, brought two highly regarded executives — Dana Walden, who is now Disney’s entertainment television chief, and John Landgraf, who runs FX Networks — into the Disney fold. It also gave Disney ownership of “The Simpsons.”

Instead, he wants Disney to change its succession plan so that Mr. Iger’s current term will be his last.

Mr. Chapek was dealt an unenviable hand: He had to deal with the pandemic, which left most of Disney’s businesses badly damaged. Ultimately, however, Mr. Chapek stumbled more than he succeeded, enmeshing Disney in a political imbroglio in Florida, running up drastic losses in streaming and alienating important creative partners in Hollywood. Disney fired Mr. Chapek in November and brought Mr. Iger out of retirement to retake the reins. The board gave Mr. Iger a two-year contract.

Before he was ousted, Mr. Chapek announced that Disney would “look for every avenue of operations and labor to find savings.” That initiative, though delayed by the upheaval atop Disney, is continuing and expected to include layoffs. Mr. Iger has also announced a restructuring that will change how Disney’s streaming services operate. Disney’s direct-to-consumer unit racked up $1.5 billion in losses in the most-recent quarter, up from $630 million in the same period a year ago.

This is the second time in six months that Disney has faced pressure from an activist investor. Over the summer, Third Point, an activist investment firm started by Dan Loeb, demanded that Disney should consider spinning off ESPN, among other moves. In the end, Disney agreed to add Carolyn Everson, a former Facebook and MTV Networks executive, to its board, and Mr. Loeb stood down.

Also on Wednesday, Disney said that Mark G. Parker, the executive chairman of Nike, would become Disney’s chairman after the company’s annual meeting of shareholders — if he is re-elected at the meeting. All members of the Disney board must be re-elected by shareholders every year. Mr. Parker has served on the board for seven years.
A date for the meeting has not yet been announced; it usually takes place in March.

Mr. Parker would succeed Susan E. Arnold, who has been chairman of Disney’s board since 2021. Ms. Arnold, a former executive at the Carlyle Group and Procter & Gamble, has served on the Disney board since 2007 and must step down because of a term limit.

Somewhat contentiously, Ms. Arnold oversaw a renewal of Mr. Chapek’s contract in June, at the time giving him nearly three more years as chief executive.

Mr. Parker will also lead a newly created committee for succession planning, which will review internal and external C.E.O. candidates.

As an activist, Mr. Peltz is largely known for his focus on operations, rather than pushing for mergers or sales as many other activists do. Mr. Peltz was previously a member of other company boards including Procter & Gamble and Unilever. Still, a company like Disney can present its own set of challenges: Running a successful Hollywood enterprise is very difficult to do on a budget.
 

https://restorethemagic.com/

Poor Corporate Governance​

Failed succession planning
“Over-the-top” compensation
Minimal shareholder engagement

Poor Strategy & Operations​

Flawed DTC strategy
Lack of cost discipline
Using Parks to subsidize streaming losses

Poor Capital Allocation​

Deteriorating returns on incremental investments
Questionable M&A judgement (Fox, Sky)
Increased leverage, eliminating 50+ yr dividend
 
I am going to fence sit on this one for the time being.

I can't believe that ultimately it is in Disney's (as a brand) best interests to be de facto run by an activist investment firm. The company has long been heading towards purely corporate, rather than creative. But, this would seal the deal. And that is sad.

It would possibly be great news in the short term for shareholders. But, I am in it for the long haul. So I'm not sure.

Saying all that, the news is potentially good news. Disney needs a big old shake. It does need to change. This could be the wake up call they need that could lead to positive changes.

So maybe I'm not on the fence. Perhaps the best outcome is: Big wake up call for Disney. Positive changes. Ultimately failed takeover bid?

Willing to be convinced overwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GAN
I am going to fence sit on this one for the time being.

I can't believe that ultimately it is in Disney's (as a brand) best interests to be de facto run by an activist investment firm. The company has long been heading towards purely corporate, rather than creative. But, this would seal the deal. And that is sad.

It would possibly be great news in the short term for shareholders. But, I am in it for the long haul. So I'm not sure.

Saying all that, the news is potentially good news. Disney needs a big old shake. It does need to change. This could be the wake up call they need that could lead to positive changes.

So maybe I'm not on the fence. Perhaps the best outcome is: Big wake up call for Disney. Positive changes. Ultimately failed takeover bid?

Willing to be convinced overwise.
I think I've mentioned this upthread, but I am familiar with Nelson Peltz and Trian. I own shares in two companies that he "targeted" over the past few years, DuPont and Proctor & Gamble. Their stock prices had languished for years, but after Peltz got through with them, they were reinvigorated. The shareholders benefited, and in the case of P&G, it's brand is stronger than ever.
 
I think I've mentioned this upthread, but I am familiar with Nelson Peltz and Trian. I own shares in two companies that he "targeted" over the past few years, DuPont and Proctor & Gamble. Their stock prices had languished for years, but after Peltz got through with them, they were reinvigorated. The shareholders benefited, and in the case of P&G, it's brand is stronger than ever.
I am certainly going to do a lot of reading up on him as an individual, and the wider firm.

I'm not buying their charm offensive at face value though. It certainly reads like a list of tell the people what they want to hear.
 
Flashback!!!

https://www.disboards.com/threads/remember-that-savedisney-com-website.479932/

Dear Supporter:
I enormously appreciate your support and offer to be of help. Our opposition to both an entrenched CEO and directors at Disney has clearly touched a nerve. Letters similar to yours are arriving by the truckload.

We are deeply committed to restoring the Disney magic and want to ensure that the Company honors its heritage and stands for quality and integrity of its products and services for future generations to come.

Please stay in touch with us via our website - www.savedisney.com - - and we will begin to communicate with you regularly regarding our collective efforts to restore the magic.

Again, thanks for your continuing support and remember, it all started with a mouse!

Sincerely,
Roy Disney
 

Trian’s Objective​


To create sustainable, long-term value at Disney by working WITH Bob Iger & the Board. Trian recognizes that Disney is undergoing a lot of change quickly and is NOT trying to create additional instability. Trian is:


NOT
looking to replace Bob Iger
FOR ensuring successful CEO succession within 2 years

NOT advocating for a break-up of Disney
FOR reinvigorating the Disney “flywheel”

NOT advocating to increase financial leverage

FOR orderly deleveraging

NOT seeking to cut costs that impact product quality or customer experience
FOR driving efficiencies and additional profits

NOT advocating for aggressive price increases at the expense of customers
FOR ensuring customers can get real value across all business lines

NOT advocating for a permanent dividend cut
FOR reinstating the dividend by FY 2025
That pretty much looks like our shareholder/customer wish list. Seems like a very different view of Trian than the media has been pushing - that they are just looking for efficiencies (cost cuts).
 
I think I've mentioned this upthread, but I am familiar with Nelson Peltz and Trian. I own shares in two companies that he "targeted" over the past few years, DuPont and Proctor & Gamble. Their stock prices had languished for years, but after Peltz got through with them, they were reinvigorated. The shareholders benefited, and in the case of P&G, it's brand is stronger than ever.
I'm not sure I'm buying what your selling here. Yeah -since Peltz got involved at PG the stock has gone up roughly 50%. PG has been a dividend titan for 50-years, so going up 50% in 5-years and maintaining a strong dividend is impressive. So there's no doubting the numbers, but was it all Peltz? I doubt it. Was Peltz involved at Pepsi, J&J, how about McDonalds? No? Guess what -they all increased 50% over the same period. Just saying there could be more than meets the eye and a "radical" takeover may not be what's necessary. Personally, I like the way they're positioned as an entertainment leader -they have plenty in their back pocket ...along with some potential deadweight.
 
I'm not sure I'm buying what your selling here. Yeah -since Peltz got involved at PG the stock has gone up roughly 50%. PG has been a dividend titan for 50-years, so going up 50% in 5-years and maintaining a strong dividend is impressive. So there's no doubting the numbers, but was it all Peltz? I doubt it. Was Peltz involved at Pepsi, J&J, how about McDonalds? No? Guess what -they all increased 50% over the same period. Just saying there could be more than meets the eye and a "radical" takeover may not be what's necessary. Personally, I like the way they're positioned as an entertainment leader -they have plenty in their back pocket ...along with some potential deadweight.
For shareholders if this takeover happens it would be a good thing. If you are a parks fan, its a terrible thing. Don't expect much investment into the parks anymore.
 
For shareholders if this takeover happens it would be a good thing. If you are a parks fan, its a terrible thing. Don't expect much investment into the parks anymore.
My point is -with or without Peltz shareholders could see a "good thing" if we're referring to stock price ...forget dividends, those have been small for decades. As someone who has visited the Parks regularly for over 40-years, I've seen some great changes and some not so great ..most of the not so great could be improved without much financial impact.
 
My point is -with or without Peltz shareholders could see a "good thing" if we're referring to stock price ...forget dividends, those have been small for decades. As someone who has visited the Parks regularly for over 40-years, I've seen some great changes and some not so great ..most of the not so great could be improved without much financial impact.
What the parks need the most is more capacity and that costs big money. Epcot, DHS and AK need a lot more attractions for the amount of guests they get.
 
So Peltz sounded like he really likes the parks and the cash they throw off, said Disney has probaly pushed pricing a little too high and that the parks need some additional Capex money! Also said he would love to build more parks but the balance sheet is too much of a disaster to do it now.
 
What the parks need the most is more capacity and that costs big money. Epcot, DHS and AK need a lot more attractions for the amount of guests they get.
I understand. I'm more on team less people, even if it means a higher cost to me ...and I'm pretty sure that's what direction Disney's moving in. Although not for everyone obviously....
 
So Peltz sounded like he really likes the parks and the cash they throw off, said Disney has probaly pushed pricing a little too high and that the parks need some additional Capex money! Also said he would love to build more parks but the balance sheet is too much of a disaster to do it now.
I am Nelson Peltz!!!
 












Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top